The role of ICP monitoring in paediatric IIH
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

A Bedside, Single Burr Hole Approach to Multimodality Monitoring in Severe Brain Injury
Published on: March 26, 2019
Harishchandra Lalgudi Srinivasan1, Carla Richetta2, Nir Manoim3
1Department of Paediatric Neurosurgery, Dana-Dwek Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6423609, Tel Aviv, Israel. theneurosurgeon9999@gmail.com.
Insights
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) diagnosis in children can be unreliable with lumbar puncture opening pressure. Intracranial pressure monitoring is recommended when IIH diagnosis is questionable, preventing unnecessary interventions.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Neurology
- Neurosurgery
Background:
- Diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) in children often relies on adult guidelines and lumbar puncture opening pressure (LP-OP).
- LP-OP can be unreliable due to various factors, making it a questionable sole diagnostic criterion.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the reliability of LP-OP in diagnosing IIH in children.
- To evaluate the importance of intracranial pressure monitoring (ICPM) when IIH diagnosis is uncertain.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of children diagnosed with IIH over 10 years.
- Comparison of LP-OP (last and mean) with ICPM in selected children.
- Analysis of long-term outcomes following diagnostic decisions.
Main Results:
- Lack of correlation between LP-OP and ICPM in 9 out of 11 children.
- ICPM refuted IIH diagnosis in 80% of cases, avoiding unnecessary treatments.
- 90% of children showed no symptom progression on long-term follow-up after ICPM-guided decisions.
Conclusions:
- Lumbar puncture opening pressure can be unreliable for diagnosing IIH in children.
- Formal intracranial pressure monitoring is advised in cases of diagnostic doubt for IIH.
Introduction:
Diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) in children is an extrapolation of the guidelines suggested for adult population. Lumbar puncture (LP) plays a crucial role in the diagnosis. The diagnosis of IIH at times is solely dependent on the interpretation of the opening pressure (OP). Unfortunately, LP-OP can vary due circumstantial parameters and therefore may be an unreliable form of intracranial pressure (ICP) measurement. Confirming the diagnosis based (as suggested by guidelines) on LP-OP in a doubtful clinical situation would be inappropriate. The aim of our study was to analyse the reliability of LP-OP and importance of ICP monitoring in situations where diagnosis of IIH was questionable.
Methods:
Retrospective review of all children with diagnosis of IIH over a 10-year period was conducted. Children who underwent ICP monitoring (ICPM) were selected. We considered 2 LP-OP values-last LP (lLP) and the mean LP (mLP) for analysis. ICPM and LP-OP were compared. Follow-up till last clinic visit was also considered for long-term outcome.
Results:
Eleven children (male 3; female 8) were included in the study. Mean delay between LP and ICPM was 112.8 days (17-257 days). There was lack of correlation between LP-OP and ICP in 9 children. ICP monitoring refuted the diagnosis of IIH in 80% of children and prevented exposure to unnecessary medical and surgical intervention. There was 1complication with ICPM. In 90% of children, there was no progression of symptoms following a decision based on ICP monitoring on long-term follow-up (mean, 36.5 months).
Conclusion:
When the diagnosis of IIH is in doubt, LP may be unreliable and formal ICP monitoring is advised.
Related Concept Videos
Inductively Coupled Plasma–Mass Spectrometry (ICP–MS): Overview
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Increased Intracranial Pressure l: Introduction
Increased Intracranial Pressure ll: Pathophysiology

