Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Quantitative Analysis of Cellular Composition in Advanced Atherosclerotic Lesions of Smooth Muscle Cell Lineage-Tracing Mice
Published on: February 20, 2019
Polygenic Scores to Assess Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Clinical Perspectives and Basic Implications
Krishna G Aragam1, Pradeep Natarajan1
1From the Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA; and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Insights
Polygenic risk scores, derived from genetic data, show promise in refining atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk assessment. Further research is needed to evaluate their clinical utility and guide implementation in healthcare.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Genetics
- Genomic Medicine
- Preventive Cardiology
Background:
- Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk is influenced by clinical and lifestyle factors.
- Growing understanding of the genetic basis of ASCVD, particularly coronary artery disease (CAD), prompts interest in genetic predictors.
- Current prevention strategies for ASCVD are multifaceted.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the development and evaluation of polygenic risk scores (PRS) for ASCVD.
- To discuss the clinical utility and mechanistic insights of PRS in CAD risk prediction.
- To explore practical considerations for implementing PRS in healthcare.
Main Methods:
- Genomic analyses of CAD have been used to create polygenic risk scores.
- Evaluation of the clinical utility of PRS through various studies.
- Review of mechanistic insights and implementation strategies for PRS.
Main Results:
- Polygenic risk scores are increasingly being developed using large-scale genotyping data.
- Studies are evaluating the ability of PRS to improve upon traditional risk factors for predicting ASCVD events.
- Mechanistic studies are providing insights into how genetic variants contribute to disease pathogenesis.
Conclusions:
- PRS represent a promising tool for refining ASCVD risk assessment and potentially guiding preventive strategies.
- Further research is necessary to validate PRS across diverse populations and determine optimal implementation pathways.
- Integration of PRS into clinical practice requires careful consideration of ethical, logistical, and clinical utility aspects.
Abstract:
An individual's susceptibility to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is influenced by numerous clinical and lifestyle factors, motivating the multifaceted approaches currently endorsed for primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention. With growing knowledge of the genetic basis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease-in particular, coronary artery disease-and its contribution to disease pathogenesis, there is increased interest in understanding the potential clinical utility of a genetic predictor that might further refine the assessment and management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk. Rapid scientific and technological advances have enabled widespread genotyping efforts and dynamic research in the field of coronary artery disease genetic risk prediction. In this review, we describe how genomic analyses of coronary artery disease have been leveraged to create polygenic risk scores. We then discuss evaluations of the clinical utility of these scores, pertinent mechanistic insights gleaned, and practical considerations relevant to the implementation of polygenic risk scores in the health care setting.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Atherosclerosis I: Introduction

