Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025

04:10
Visually Sexing Loggerhead Shrike Lanius Ludovicianus Using Plumage Coloration and Pattern
Published on: March 8, 2020
6.5K
Model selection for the North American Breeding Bird Survey
William A Link1, John R Sauer1, Daniel K Niven1
1U.S. Geological Survey Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, Maryland, 20708, USA.
Summary
New models for analyzing North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) data favor different year effects and overdispersion structures. These preferred models offer improved hierarchical analysis for bird population trends.
Area of Science:
- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
- Quantitative Ecology
- Ornithology
Background:
- The North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) is a crucial dataset for analyzing bird population dynamics.
- Traditional model selection methods are often unsuitable for complex hierarchical models used with BBS data.
- Leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) is effective but computationally intensive for large datasets like the BBS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct the first large-scale formal model selection for BBS data using LOOCV on sampled observations.
- To compare four alternative hierarchical models differing in year effect structures and overdispersion descriptions.
- To evaluate model performance for 548 North American bird species.
Main Methods:
- Applied LOOCV to stratified random samples of BBS observations.
- Compared four hierarchical models: two year effect structures (D vs. S models) and two overdispersion structures (H vs. normal distribution).
- Utilized a hierarchical model across species to determine posterior probabilities for best-fit models.
Main Results:
- Models with conditionally independent year effects (D models) were generally favored over slope-based year effects (S models).
- Models with t-distributed overdispersion (H models) were favored over normally distributed overdispersion.
- The favored D and H models were recommended for 544 out of 548 species, with minimal impact on overall population trend estimates.
Conclusions:
- Recommend adopting D and H models for BBS data analysis, moving away from the conventional S model for most species.
- The favored models provide a more robust analysis of bird population trends, especially for species with significant population changes.
- WAIC, a simpler alternative to LOOCV, was found to be unreliable for this large-scale model selection task.
Related Concept Videos
Conservation of Declining Populations
12.4K
Conservation of declining population focuses on ways of detecting, diagnosing, and halting a population decline. The approach uses methods to prevent populations from going extinct.
12.4K
Types of Selection
43.6K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
43.6K
Mate Choice
11.4K
Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
11.4K
Frequency-dependent Selection
22.9K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
22.9K
Limits to Natural Selection
33.8K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
33.8K
Natural Selection and Mating Preferences
386
The principle of natural selection posits that organisms better adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. This principle is closely intertwined with mating preferences, a key aspect of sexual selection, which evolutionary psychologists believe is driven by instincts to propagate one's genes. Such instincts significantly influence mating behaviors and preferences between genders.
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing,...
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing,...
386

