Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025

A Bedside, Single Burr Hole Approach to Multimodality Monitoring in Severe Brain Injury
Published on: March 26, 2019
The NAG scale can screen for hematoma expansion in acute intracerebral hemorrhage-a multi-institutional validation
Kenichi Sakuta1, Hiroshi Yaguchi1, Takeo Sato2
1Department of Neurology, The Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Japan.
Background:
Early hematoma expansion (HE) is seen in approximately 30% of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), but detecting patients with a high HE risk is challenging.
Aims:
The NAG scale is a simple predictive scale for HE in acute ICH patients. Multi-institutional validation of the usefulness of this scale was the aim of this study.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed 142 consecutive primary ICH patients admitted to our hospital between September 2016 and December 2018. The NAG scale consists of three factors: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥ 10, anticoagulant use, and glucose ≥133 mg/dl (1 point each). Patients underwent non-contrast computed tomography (CT) within 24 h of symptom onset and follow-up CT 6 h, 24 h, and 7 days after admission. We defined HE as increased hemorrhage volume > 33% or an absolute increase of >6 mL on follow-up CT. Poor prognosis was defined as a modified Rankin scale score of 4-6 at discharge. We performed logistic regression analysis and created receiver operating characteristic curves to determine the discrimination ability of the NAG score.
Results:
Patients constituted 96 men and 46 women (median age: 64 years; median NIHSS: 11), and HE was observed in 38/142 patients (27%). Higher NAG sores were associated with HE (P < .001), poor prognosis (P < .001), and in-hospital death (P < .001). The C statistic was 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63-0.82) for HE, 0.67 (95% CI: 0.58-0.76) for poor prognosis, and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.74-0.95) for in-hospital death. Multivariate logistic regression analysis with known risk factors showed that NAG scale score was an independent risk factor for HE (odds ratio: 2.95; 95% CI: 1.57-5.52; P = .001).
Conclusion:
The NAG scale showed good discrimination in our multi-institutional validation.

