Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

320
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
320
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

379
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
379
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

31.4K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
31.4K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.6K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.6K
Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

162
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in...
162
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

136
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the...
136

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding the associations between neurodevelopmental features and internalising and externalising behaviours: A transdiagnostic approach.

JCPP advances·2026
Same author

Correction: Sarcasm Use in Polish and Turkish: The Role of Personality, Age and Gender.

Journal of psycholinguistic research·2026
Same author

Sarcam Use in Polish and Turkish: The Role of Personality, Age and Gender.

Journal of psycholinguistic research·2025
Same author

Seeing it in others versus doing it yourself: Social desirability judgements and conversation production data from autistic and non-autistic children.

Autism : the international journal of research and practice·2024
Same author

Conversational topic maintenance and related cognitive abilities in autistic versus neurotypical children.

Autism : the international journal of research and practice·2024
Same author

Assessing pragmatic language difficulties using the Revised Children's Communication Checklist-2. Exploratory structural equation modeling and associations with restricted and repetitive behaviors.

Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.5K

Using shared knowledge to determine ironic intent; a conversational response paradigm.

Maria ZajĄczkowska1, Kirsten Abbot-Smith1, Christina S Kim2

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Kent, UK.

Journal of Child Language
|April 28, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Seven-year-olds use mentalising, the ability to understand others' mental states, to interpret irony. This study experimentally shows children utilize shared knowledge for understanding ironic utterances, a key finding in developmental psychology.

More Related Videos

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.6K
Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication
07:18

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.5K
Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.6K
Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication
07:18

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Linguistics

Background:

  • Mentalising (understanding others' mental states) is theorized to be crucial for interpreting irony.
  • Children's capacity for mental set switching, flexible task approach, was hypothesized as another key factor.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To experimentally investigate the roles of mentalising and mental set switching in 7-year-olds' irony interpretation.
  • To examine how shared knowledge between speaker and listener influences children's detection of irony.

Main Methods:

  • Children aged seven were tested using a paradigm involving manipulated mentalising (shared knowledge) and mental set switching.
  • Participants selected a listener's potential reply based on whether the listener possessed knowledge for ironic interpretation.

Main Results:

  • The manipulation of mental set switching yielded null results, suggesting it does not significantly impact irony interpretation in this age group.
  • The study provides the first experimental evidence that 7-year-olds employ mentalising to discern ironic intent.

Conclusions:

  • Mentalising, specifically understanding shared knowledge, is a critical cognitive skill for young children's ability to interpret irony.
  • This research highlights the developmental emergence of sophisticated social cognition in understanding figurative language.