Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Impact of Social Context on Individuals01:21

Impact of Social Context on Individuals

224
Social psychology examines how the real or imagined presence of others influences individuals' thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. A key concept in this field is the role of social context in shaping behavior. The same individual may act differently depending on the social setting, due to the varying expectations and norms associated with each environment. This context-dependent behavior illustrates the influence of social roles, which prescribe appropriate conduct in specific situations.Social...
224
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.6K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.6K
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

42.8K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
42.8K
Self Within Cultural Contexts01:30

Self Within Cultural Contexts

121
Cultural frameworks for understanding the self are often categorized into two broad orientations: individualism and collectivism. These paradigms influence how people define themselves, relate to others, and interpret their social worlds. Each orientation offers distinct perspectives on autonomy, responsibility, and the role of the individual within a community.Individualistic CulturesIn individualistic cultures like North America and Western Europe, identity is understood as autonomous and...
121
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

15.2K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
15.2K
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

2.1K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
2.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

On the Dangers of Cancer Exceptionalism in Pain Medicine.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
Same journal

Suck It Up and Stay on the Grind: Ethical Considerations Surrounding Trust, Chronic Pain, and the American Workplace.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
Same journal

<i>Morbus Mediterraneus</i>: A Cultural Alibi for an Unequal Pain Burden.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
Same journal

Beyond Words: A Philosophical Analysis of the Linguistic Refractoriness of Chronic Pain.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
Same journal

When "Good-Enough" Treatment Is Not Good Enough: Epistemic Injustice, Pain-Related Motivational Deficit, and Epistemic Deflection in the Treatment of Gynecological Pain.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
Same journal

The Silent Struggle: A Woman's Journey Through Pain.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 23, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.0K

Contextual Injustice.

Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
    |April 28, 2020
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study introduces "contextual injustice," where social power unjustly manipulates conversational standards. It explores how this impacts truth and justice, particularly in sensitive discussions like sexual assault allegations.

    More Related Videos

    A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
    08:12

    A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

    Published on: March 1, 2022

    2.8K
    Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
    07:36

    Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

    Published on: November 30, 2018

    16.2K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Dec 23, 2025

    The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
    08:24

    The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

    Published on: August 25, 2023

    1.0K
    A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
    08:12

    A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

    Published on: March 1, 2022

    2.8K
    Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
    07:36

    Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

    Published on: November 30, 2018

    16.2K

    Area of Science:

    • Philosophy of Language
    • Social Epistemology
    • Linguistic Justice

    Background:

    • Contextualist theories permit conflicting intuitions to coexist as true.
    • Normative questions arise regarding appropriate conversational standards.
    • Social power dynamics in setting these standards are often overlooked.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • Introduce and define "contextual injustice."
    • Analyze the unjust manipulation of conversational parameters in context-sensitive discourse.
    • Examine the link between language, epistemology, and social justice.

    Main Methods:

    • Applying contextualism in knowledge ascriptions to sexual assault allegations.
    • Analyzing parallel dynamics in politically significant terms, including gender.
    • Exploring connections between language, epistemology, and social justice.

    Main Results:

    • Contextual injustice arises from the unequal social power to set conversational standards.
    • This manipulation can lead to oppression and hinder the pursuit of justice.
    • Language's role in shaping our understanding of knowledge and social realities is significant.

    Conclusions:

    • Contextual standards are not neutral; they are shaped by social power.
    • Addressing contextual injustice is crucial for achieving social justice.
    • Further research is needed on the intersection of language, power, and epistemology.