Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Ocular Therapeutic Delivery and Advanced Tissue Retrieval in Adult Rats
Published on: May 23, 2025
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide as first steroid-sparing agent in childhood frequently relapsing and
Jameela A Kari1,2, Khalid A Alhasan3, Amr S Albanna4
1Faculty of Medicine, King Abduaziz University, PO Box 80215, Jeddah, 21589, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. jkari@doctors.org.uk.
Insights
Rituximab is as effective and safe as cyclophosphamide for children with frequent relapsing steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS). This study suggests rituximab may offer better steroid withdrawal rates, warranting further investigation.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nephrology
- Immunology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) affects many children, with about 50% experiencing frequent relapses or steroid dependency.
- This necessitates the use of steroid-sparing agents to manage the condition and reduce steroid toxicity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of rituximab versus oral cyclophosphamide as initial steroid-sparing treatments in children with SSNS.
- To evaluate relapse rates, steroid dose reduction, and adverse events associated with both medications.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, open-label, non-randomized study involving 46 children with frequent relapsing or steroid-dependent SSNS.
- Participants received either oral cyclophosphamide (3 mg/kg/day for 8 weeks) or intravenous rituximab (two 375 mg/m² doses, 2 weeks apart).
- Children were monitored for 12 months for relapses and side effects.
Main Results:
- One-year relapse-free survival was 58.6% with cyclophosphamide and 84.2% with rituximab.
- Both treatments significantly reduced the required daily steroid dose.
- Complete steroid withdrawal within 3 months was achieved by 73.7% of rituximab patients versus 29.6% of cyclophosphamide patients (p=0.003).
- Transient leucopenia was the most common side effect with cyclophosphamide; rituximab had one infusion-related skin rash.
Conclusions:
- Rituximab is non-inferior and safe compared to cyclophosphamide as a first-line steroid-sparing agent in pediatric SSNS.
- Rituximab demonstrated a trend towards better relapse-free survival and a significantly higher rate of complete steroid withdrawal.
- Larger multicenter studies are needed to confirm superiority and long-term outcomes.
Background:
Approximately 50% of children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) will suffer from frequent relapses or steroid dependency, prompting the use of so-called steroid-sparing drugs. In this pilot study, we compare the efficacy and safety of rituximab to oral cyclophosphamide as first-line steroid-sparing medications.
Methods:
A prospective open-label non-randomized study of children with frequent relapsing or steroid-dependant SSNS. Exclusion criteria were steroid-resistant disease, prescription of immunosuppressive agents other than prednisolone or levamisole, evidence of impaired kidney function, leucopenia, or active infection. The recruited children were allocated either to the oral cyclophosphamide (3 mg/kg/day for 8 weeks) or intravenous rituximab treatment (two doses of 375 mg/m2/dose, 2 weeks apart) and were monitored for relapses and side effects for 12 months.
Results:
Forty-six subjects were included from two centers; 27 received cyclophosphamide and 19 received rituximab. One-year relapse-free survival was reached in 17 (58.6%) patients treated with cyclophosphamide compared to 16 (84.2%) with rituximab (adjusted HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.09-1.45; p = 0.151). The mean interval to relapse was 6.9 months in the cyclophosphamide group (N = 10) and 6.3 months in the rituximab group (N = 3). Both treatments were associated with a significant (p < 0.001) reduction in prescribed dose of oral alternate-day steroid from 1.02 to 0.36 mg/kg (cyclophosphamide) and 0.86 to 0.08 mg/kg (rituximab). Importantly, a significantly (p = 0.003) higher percentage of patients achieved complete withdrawal of steroid within 3 months of commencing study treatment in the rituximab (73.7%) versus cyclophosphamide (29.6%) group. Transient leucopenia was the most frequent adverse effect observed in the cyclophosphamide group (18.5%) and one patient (3.4%) had acute hepatotoxicity besides severe leucopenia and neutropenia in the 7th week of treatment with complete recovery with the withdrawal of cyclophosphamide and maintenance of remission. A minor infusion-related reaction in the form of a generalized macular skin rash was observed in one patient (5%) in the rituximab group.
Conclusions:
Rituximab is non-inferior to cyclophosphamide and safe as a first-line steroid-sparing agent in children with SSNS. A larger multicenter study is required to assess superiority over cyclophosphamide. Graphical abstract.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Glucocorticoids
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Nephrotic Syndrome I : Introduction
Nephrotic Syndrome II : Assessment and Medical Management
Antiasthma Drugs: Inhaled Corticosteroids and Glucocorticoids
ICS work through a multifaceted mechanism of action. They suppress the inflammatory response caused by the proliferation of TH cells. They also reduce the transcription of the IL-2 gene, which is involved in the...

