Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Cochlea01:13

The Cochlea

49.9K
The cochlea is a coiled structure in the inner ear that contains hair cells—the sensory receptors of the auditory system. Sound waves are transmitted to the cochlea by small bones attached to the eardrum called the ossicles, which vibrate the oval window that leads to the inner ear. This causes fluid in the chambers of the cochlea to move, vibrating the basilar membrane.
49.9K
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

825
The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
825
Hearing01:31

Hearing

56.2K
When we hear a sound, our nervous system is detecting sound waves—pressure waves of mechanical energy traveling through a medium. The frequency of the wave is perceived as pitch, while the amplitude is perceived as loudness.
56.2K
Hair Cells01:22

Hair Cells

44.0K
Hair cells are the sensory receptors of the auditory system—they transduce mechanical sound waves into electrical energy that the nervous system can understand. Hair cells are located in the organ of Corti within the cochlea of the inner ear, between the basilar and tectorial membranes. The actual sensory receptors are called inner hair cells. The outer hair cells serve other functions, such as sound amplification in the cochlea, and are not discussed in detail here.
44.0K
Anatomy of the Ear01:16

Anatomy of the Ear

10.8K
Auditory sensation, commonly called hearing, involves the transformation of sonic waves into neural impulses facilitated by the structures of the auditory organ. The prominent, flesh-like structure on the side of the head, called the auricle, directs sound waves towards the auditory canal. The auricle is often mislabeled as the pinna, a term more aligned with mobile structures like a feline's external ear. The auditory canal penetrates the cranium via the external auditory meatus of the...
10.8K
Auditory Pathway01:15

Auditory Pathway

6.9K
Auditory pathways constitute the complex neural circuits responsible for transmitting and interpreting auditory information from the peripheral auditory system to the brain. Sound waves are initially captured by the outer ear, funneled through the ear canal, and reach the tympanic membrane (eardrum). These vibrations are transmitted via the middle ear's ossicles to the inner ear's cochlea.
When viewed cross-sectionally, the cochlea reveals the scala vestibuli and scala tympani flanking...
6.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dynamics of domestic cat hepatitis B virus infection in juvenile cats.

Veterinary microbiology·2026
Same author

Short-term audiological outcomes of the mCLIP ARC ball joint prosthesis- a retrospective multicenter study.

European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery·2025
Same author

Towards the optimization of drug delivery to the cochlear apex: Influence of polymer and drug selection in biodegradable intracochlear implants.

International journal of pharmaceutics·2023
Same author

Extreme weather conditions influence the frequency of epistaxis-related emergency room visits.

Rhinology·2022
Same author

Plasma VEGF - a candidate biomarker for response to treatment with bevacizumab in HHT patients.

Rhinology·2019
Same author

Effects of clopidogrel with or without aspirin on the generation of extracellular vesicles in the microcirculation and in venous blood: A randomized placebo controlled trial.

Thrombosis research·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

693

Formant frequency discrimination with a fine structure sound coding strategy for cochlear implants.

R Liepins1, A Kaider2, C Honeder1

  • 1Medical University of Vienna, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Vienna, Austria.

Hearing Research
|April 28, 2020
PubMed
Summary

The FS4 cochlear implant (CI) strategy, with more temporal fine structure channels, showed similar speech perception to FSP. However, FS4 improved formant frequency discrimination for specific sounds, indicating potential benefits for timbre perception in electrical hearing.

Keywords:
Cochlear implantsFormant discriminationSound coding strategySpeech perceptionTemporal fine structure

More Related Videos

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
10:50

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

14.8K
Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
03:58

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion

Published on: January 17, 2025

734

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

693
Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
10:50

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

14.8K
Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
03:58

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion

Published on: January 17, 2025

734

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Cochlear implant (CI) sound coding strategies increasingly focus on temporal fine structure (TFS) transmission.
  • The impact of TFS coding on electrical hearing perception remains incompletely understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of varying TFS coverage on sound perception in adult CI users.
  • To compare the FS4 strategy (more TFS channels) against the FSP strategy (fewer TFS channels).

Main Methods:

  • A longitudinal cross-over study involving 34 adult CI patients with over one year of CI experience.
  • Participants used both FS4 and FSP coding strategies for three months each in a randomized sequence.
  • Outcome measures included formant frequency discrimination thresholds (FFDT), speech perception in quiet and noise, and subjective sound quality assessments.

Main Results:

  • The FS4 strategy demonstrated improved FFDT for formants within its extended TFS range, showing a significant interaction favoring FS4.
  • Speech perception in quiet and noise was comparable between the FS4 and FSP strategies.
  • Subjective sound quality ratings were heterogeneous, suggesting individual variability in preference.

Conclusions:

  • While FS4 offers enhanced fine structure processing, leading to improved timbre resolution for certain sounds, overall speech perception remains similar to FSP.
  • Both FS4 and FSP represent viable options for CI fitting, allowing for personalized optimization of sound perception.