The Preimplantation Psychosocial Evaluation and Prediction of Clinical Outcomes During Mechanical Circulatory

Mary Amanda Dew1,2,3,4,5, Jennifer C Hollenberger6,7, Laura L Obregon8,9

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Transplantation
|April 30, 2020
PubMed

Insights

Psychosocial evaluations for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) candidates predict clinical decisions and post-implantation risks. Addressing mental health, adherence, and substance use can improve outcomes for patients receiving MCS.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Psychology
  • Medical Devices

Background:

  • Psychosocial evaluations are mandatory for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) candidates, regardless of therapy type (destination therapy or bridge to transplantation).
  • Current guidelines identify contraindications but lack comprehensive analysis of psychosocial domains' prognostic value for clinical outcomes.
  • This study investigates the predictive power of overall psychosocial risk and specific domains on MCS outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if overall psychosocial risk predicts clinical decisions and post-implantation outcomes in MCS recipients.
  • To identify specific psychosocial domains that are most prognostic for adverse clinical events.
  • To inform strategies for mitigating psychosocial risk factors in MCS patients.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 241 adult MCS recipients from April 2004 to December 2017 at a single site.
  • Psychosocial evaluations were coded using an established rating system to assess overall and domain-specific risk (low, moderate, high).
  • Multivariable analyses examined the association between psychosocial risk and MCS use decisions, mortality, transplantation, rehospitalization, pump exchange, and adverse events (AEs).

Main Results:

  • Higher overall psychosocial risk was associated with increased likelihood of destination therapy (DT) decisions (OR, 1.76; P=0.017).
  • Increased psychosocial risk predicted post-implantation pump exchange and adverse events (HRs ≥ 1.25; P ≤ 0.042), particularly cardiac arrhythmias and device malfunctions.
  • Mental health severity, poor medical adherence, and substance use were specific psychosocial domains predicting study outcomes (ORs/HRs ≥ 1.32; P ≤ 0.010).

Conclusions:

  • Psychosocial evaluations are crucial predictors of both clinical decisions regarding MCS use (DT vs. bridge) and significant post-implantation outcomes.
  • Identifying and addressing psychosocial risk factors pre- or post-implantation may reduce clinical risks.
  • Targeted interventions for mental health, adherence, and substance use could improve patient management and outcomes in mechanical circulatory support.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos