Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Surface Defects of Remover Retreatment File After Single and Multiple Uses
Published on: October 11, 2024
[Comparison of dentinal microcracks formation in severely curved root canal with different Ni-Ti instruments]
Yu-Hong Tang1, Rui Xu, Qian Zhu
1Dental Diseases Prevention and Treatment Center of Jiading District. Shanghai 201899, China.
Purpose:
This study was aimed to compare the incidence of dentinal microcracks produced by 3 kinds of Ni-Ti instruments during root canal procedures in severely curved canals.
Methods:
Two hundred and forty extracted human molars with mesial roots of 25° to 40° curvatures were selected and divided into A, B, C group, with 80 teeth in each group according to root curvature of 25°-30°(excluding 25°), 30°-35°,35°-40°. Each of them was prepared with K file to 15#. Then, each group was divided into 4 sub-groups (n=20), one was as control, the others were prepared with WaveOne, ProTaper Next and M3-Pro, respectively. After preparation, all roots were stained with 1% methylene blue for 24 hours. The roots were then sectioned at the most curved plane and 2mm below and above the most curved plane with alow-speed saw under cold water. Stereomicroscope was used to inspect dentinal microcracks and differences between each group were analyzed using Chi-square test with SPSS 20.0 software package.
Results:
Microcracks were observed in the group of WaveOne, ProTaper Next and M3-Pro. WaveOne system induced more dentinal microcracks compared with ProTaper Next and M3-Pro system (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between ProTaper Next and M3-Pro system (P>0.05). The number of dentinal microcracks in WaveOne, ProTaper Next and M3-Pro group increased with the increase of root curvature. Except Waveone in group A (25°-30°) and group C (35°-40°), the occurrence of dentinal microcracks in two groups had significant difference (P<0.05), there was no significant difference among other groups (P>0.05).
Conclusions:
Compared to WaveOne, ProTaper Next and M3-Pro are more suitable for severely curved canal preparation.
More Related Videos
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
06:16Author Spotlight: Establishing an Accurate Microhardness Testing Protocol for Craniofacial Tissues
Published on: April 26, 2024