Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Influenza A Virus Studies in a Mouse Model of Infection
Published on: September 7, 2017
A phase Ⅱ, randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a Sabin strain-based inactivated
Rong Tang1, Guifan Li2, Chengfu Zhang3
1Department of Vaccine Clinical Evaluation, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Public Health Research Institute of Jiangsu Province) , Jiangsu, China.
Insights
This study found that experimental Sabin inactivated poliovirus vaccines (IPV) with varying D antigen content demonstrated good safety and immunogenicity in infants. While more reactogenic than controls, they showed promising results for polio prevention.
Area of Science:
- Vaccinology
- Immunology
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Poliovirus vaccines are crucial for global polio eradication efforts.
- Sabin-strain inactivated poliovirus vaccines (IPV) offer an alternative to Salk-strain IPV.
- Evaluating the safety and immunogenicity of novel IPV formulations is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the safety and immunogenicity of experimental Sabin IPV preparations with varying D antigen content.
- To compare these experimental vaccines against control Sabin IPV and Salk IPV in infants.
Main Methods:
- A phase II, randomized, controlled trial involving 600 infants aged 60-90 days.
- Infants received one of five IPV preparations (three experimental Sabin IPVs, one control Sabin IPV, one control Salk IPV) on a 0-1-2 month schedule.
- Safety was monitored via observation and follow-up; immunogenicity was assessed by serum antibody titers before and after vaccination.
Main Results:
- All experimental Sabin IPV groups showed high seroconversion rates for poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3, comparable to control groups.
- Injection site reactions (redness, swelling, pain) were significantly higher in experimental vaccine groups compared to controls.
- No serious adverse events related to vaccination were detected; most reactions were mild to moderate.
Conclusions:
- Experimental Sabin IPVs with low, medium, and high D antigen content exhibit favorable safety and immunogenicity profiles.
- These novel IPV formulations are potential candidates for future polio immunization strategies.
- Further studies may be warranted to optimize reactogenicity while maintaining efficacy.
Abstract:
This phase Ⅱ, randomized, controlled trial aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a various Sabin IPV preparations. Six hundred infants aged 60 ~ 90 days received one of five different vaccines: low- (group A), medium- (group B) or high-D antigen content (group C) of an experimental Sabin IPV, control Sabin IPV (group D) or control Salk IPV (group E), on a 0-1-2 month schedule. Participants were observed and followed up within 30 days of each dose to assess safety. Serum samples were collected before the first dose and 30 days after the third dose to assess immunogenicity. After three doses, type-1 seroconversion rates of groups A-E were 99.1%, 100.0%, 99.1%, 99.0%, and 93.4%, respectively; type-2 seroconversion rates were 93.5%, 97.1%, 98.1%, 95.1%, and 91.5%, respectively; and type-3 seroconversion rates were 95.4%, 98.1%, 98.1%, 95.1%, and 100.0%, respectively. Only type-1 seroconversion rates differed significantly for group E. The incidences of injection-site redness (A: 21.9%, B: 23.7%, C: 29.4%, D: 16.2%, E: 12.7%), swelling (A: 6.7%, B: 6.8%, C: 5.0%, D: 0.0%, E: 1.7%) and pain (A: 5.0%, B: 6.8%, C: 7.6%, D: 0.0%, E: 0.9%) all were significantly higher for experimental vaccines relative to control groups. No SAEs were detected related to vaccination, and most adverse reactions were mild or moderate in severity. In conclusion, the experimental Sabin IPVs with low-, medium-, and high-D antigen content all revealed good safety and immunogenicity profiles although being more reactogenic than the control vaccines.
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Smallpox
Poliomyelitis
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease

