Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Development and Validation of a Comprehensive Well-Being Scale for People in the University Environment (Pitt
Leming Zhou1, Bambang Parmanto1
1Department of Health Information Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Background:
Well-being has multiple domains, and these domains are unique to the population being examined. Therefore, to precisely assess the well-being of a population, a scale specifically designed for that population is needed.
Objective:
The goal of this study was to design and validate a comprehensive well-being scale for people in a university environment, including students, faculty, and staff.
Methods:
A crowdsourcing approach was used to determine relevant domains for the comprehensive well-being scale in this population and identify specific questions to include in each domain. A web-based questionnaire (Q1) was used to collect opinions from a group of university students, faculty, and staff about the domains and subdomains of the scale. A draft of a new well-being scale (Q2) was created in response to the information collected via Q1, and a second group of study participants was invited to evaluate the relevance and clarity of each statement. A newly created well-being scale (Q3) was then used by a third group of university students, faculty, and staff. A psychometric analysis was performed on the data collected via Q3 to determine the validity and reliability of the well-being scale.
Results:
In the first step, a group of 518 university community members (students, faculty, and staff) indicated the domains and subdomains that they desired to have in a comprehensive well-being scale. In the second step, a second group of 167 students, faculty, and staff evaluated the relevance and clarity of the proposed statements in each domain. In the third step, a third group of 546 students, faculty, and staff provided their responses to the new well-being scale (Pitt Wellness Scale). The psychometric analysis indicated that the reliability of the well-being scale was high.
Conclusions:
Using a crowdsourcing approach, we successfully created a comprehensive and highly reliable well-being scale for people in the university environment. Our new Pitt Wellness Scale may be used to measure the well-being of people in the university environment.
Related Concept Videos
Traits, Mood, and Subjective Wellbeing
Neuroticism and...
Surveys
Social Relationships and Well-Being
Dimensions of Health and Illness
Cross-Sectional Research
Self-Discrepancy Theory

