Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults
Published on: February 2, 2020
Home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC): a systematic review
Aylin Wagner1, René Schaffert2, Nathalie Möckli3
1ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, School of Health Professions, Institute of Health Sciences, Technikumstrasse 71, 8401, Winterthur, Switzerland. aylin.wagner@zhaw.ch.
This review found that the validity and reliability of Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) quality indicators (QIs) are not sufficiently tested. Further research is needed to strengthen the scientific soundness of these important home care quality measures.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Quality Measurement
- Gerontology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Home care quality is often measured using quality indicators (QIs) derived from Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) data.
- To ensure meaningful quality improvement and comparisons, RAI-HC QIs must demonstrate validity and reliability.
- This systematic review aimed to identify existing RAI-HC QIs and evaluate the evidence for their psychometric properties.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically identify currently existing RAI-HC QIs.
- To summarize the scientific knowledge on the validity and reliability of these RAI-HC QIs.
- To provide guidance for future research on improving RAI-HC QI validation.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review was conducted using multiple electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library).
- Studies describing the development or psychometric characteristics of RAI-HC QIs were included.
- The Appraisal of Indicators through Research and Evaluation (AIRE) instrument was used to assess the methodological quality of identified QI sets.
Main Results:
- Four studies met inclusion criteria, describing three RAI-HC QI sets with 48 unique QIs, primarily focusing on care outcomes.
- The validity and reliability of these identified RAI-HC QIs were generally not sufficiently tested.
- None of the evaluated QI sets achieved high methodological quality across all AIRE instrument domains.
Conclusions:
- This is the first systematic review appraising the scientific evidence on RAI-HC QI validity and reliability.
- Insufficient reporting of validation processes and reliability, along with a lack of state-of-the-art methodologies, were identified.
- Further investigations into RAI-HC QI reliability and validity are recommended, given their current use in home care quality assessment.
More Related Videos
04:13Using a Real-Time Locating System to Measure Walking Activity Associated with Wandering Behaviors Among Institutionalized Older Adults
Published on: February 8, 2019
02:28Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients
Published on: March 1, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Restorative Care
Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Rheumatic Heart Disease IV: Nursing Management