Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

800
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
800
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.0K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.7K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.7K
Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

3.9K
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
3.9K
Heuristics01:21

Heuristics

563
Heuristics are problem-solving strategies that use mental shortcuts to simplify decision-making. Unlike algorithms, which must be followed precisely to achieve a correct result, heuristics offer a general problem-solving framework. They save time and energy but can sometimes lead to less rational decisions.
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
563
Critical Thinking01:19

Critical Thinking

924
Critical thinking involves reflective and productive thinking and the evaluation of evidence. Critical thinkers seek to understand the deeper meaning of ideas, question assumptions, and make independent decisions about what to believe or do. Scientists, for instance, are often critical thinkers. Critical thinking also requires humility about what we know and don't know and the motivation to look beyond the obvious. It is essential for effective problem-solving.
Colleges and universities are...
924

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An International Delphi Study on the Challenges of Self-Experimentation for Medical Research Ethics.

Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE·2026
Same author

Promoting shared decision-making in colorectal cancer screening in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Evaluating the GRACE voice assistant for dementia care among caregivers and healthcare professionals: An interview study.

Digital health·2026
Same author

Navigating Uncertain Outcomes: A Case Study on Preference-Sensitive Decision-Making in Neurocritical Care.

The Neurohospitalist·2026
Same author

Moral distress or workplace recognition? Associations with burnout and intention to quit in Swiss nurses and midwives.

Journal of health psychology·2026
Same author

Analyzing Misinformation and Disinformation: Understanding Swiss COVID-19 Narratives Through Natural Language Processing Analysis.

JMIR infodemiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 22, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.8K

Decision-making capacity: from testing to evaluation.

Helena Hermann1, Martin Feuz1, Manuel Trachsel1

  • 1Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 30, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland.

Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy
|May 1, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The U-Doc tool aids clinicians in evaluating patient decision-making capacity (DMC) by focusing on the judgment process. It supports ethical reasoning and justification but requires careful handling of subjectivity.

Keywords:
CompetenceDecision-making capacityDocumentationEthicsEvaluationTool

More Related Videos

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.2K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 22, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.8K
Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.2K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Healthcare Decision-Making

Background:

  • Patient self-determination in medical decisions hinges on decision-making capacity (DMC).
  • DMC evaluations involve ethical reasoning and are influenced by clinician values.
  • Existing tools may not adequately support the nuanced judgment required for DMC assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and explore the perceived benefits and challenges of a new tool, the U-Doc, designed to assist clinicians in DMC evaluations.
  • To shift the focus from measuring mental abilities to supporting the clinician's judgmental process.

Main Methods:

  • A qualitative study was conducted to explore clinicians' experiences with the U-Doc tool.
  • The study focused on the perceived benefits and difficulties associated with using the evaluation guide.

Main Results:

  • The U-Doc provides orientation, promotes a holistic patient view, and enhances ethical awareness and consideration of personal biases.
  • It aids in structuring decision-making, argumentation, and justification processes.
  • Ambiguities and the confrontation with subjectivity due to a lack of operationalization were noted as challenging aspects.

Conclusions:

  • The U-Doc serves as a valuable guide, emphasizing the clinician's role in DMC evaluations.
  • While beneficial for structured ethical reasoning, its interpretative nature requires careful management by clinicians.