Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...

Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP

Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a diagnostic procedure that combines endoscopy and fluoroscopy to diagnose and treat conditions related to the bile ducts, pancreatic ducts, and gallbladder. This procedure is beneficial for identifying and addressing blockages, gallstones, strictures, and tumors within the biliary or pancreatic systems. ERCP is both diagnostic and therapeutic, offering the ability to visualize and treat identified problems in one session.
Patient...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

[Predictive role of erythrocytes in assessment of COVID-19 outcomes].

Voprosy virusologii·2023

Same author

[Morphological compound and indicators of the blood clotting system in severe COVID-19 patients of middle aged and elderly during treatment of Tocilizumab and Thymalin.]

Advances in gerontology = Uspekhi gerontologii·2022

Same author

Possibilities of Multilayer Perceptron in Complexing Risk Factors of Diabetic Foot Syndrome.

Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine·2022

Same author

Changes in Some Vascular Biomarkers in Patients with Severe COVID-19 with Various Degrees of Pulmonary Hypertension.

Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine·2022

Same author

[Creatine phosphokinase as a predictor of acute destructive cholecystitis].

Khirurgiia·2022

Same author

[Retroperitoneal drainage for apostematous pyelonephritis in a patient with severe COVID-19 infection and diabetes mellitus type 1].

Khirurgiia·2022

Same journal

[Outcomes of Surgical Correction of the Urethra in the Management of Postcoital Cystitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis].

Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999)·2025

Same journal

[Use of Longidaza in chronic prostatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis].

Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999)·2025

Same journal

[Epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and microbiology of suppurative pyelonephritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis, part 1].

Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999)·2025

Same journal

[Endocrine and metabolic changes in prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy].

Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999)·2025

Same journal

[Risks of acute kidney injury with intravascular administration of an iodine-containing contrast agent in patients with acute pyelonephritis].

Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999)·2025

Same journal

[Pharmacological treatment of overactive bladder: the potential of anticholinergic therapy].

Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999)·2025

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 22, 2025

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Published on: May 19, 2022

[Retroperitoneoscopic technologies in retroperitoneal procedures].

Yu S Lobanov¹, K G Shapovalov¹, S L Lobanov¹

¹FGBOU VO Chita State Medical University, Chita, Russia.

Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999)

|May 1, 2020

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Choosing the best endoscopic approach for retroperitoneal organs is crucial. This review compares transperitoneal and retroperitoneoscopic methods, highlighting their pros, cons, and limitations for minimally invasive surgery.

Keywords:

minimally invasive surgery retroperitoneal space retroperitoneoscopy

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Recent Advancements in Reoperative Foregut Surgery

Author Spotlight: Recent Advancements in Reoperative Foregut Surgery

Published on: September 22, 2023

Prone Lateral Minimally Invasive Retropleural Corpectomy Using a Rotatable Radiolucent Jackson Table

Prone Lateral Minimally Invasive Retropleural Corpectomy Using a Rotatable Radiolucent Jackson Table

Published on: July 3, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 22, 2025

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Published on: May 19, 2022

Author Spotlight: Recent Advancements in Reoperative Foregut Surgery

Author Spotlight: Recent Advancements in Reoperative Foregut Surgery

Published on: September 22, 2023

Prone Lateral Minimally Invasive Retropleural Corpectomy Using a Rotatable Radiolucent Jackson Table

Prone Lateral Minimally Invasive Retropleural Corpectomy Using a Rotatable Radiolucent Jackson Table

Published on: July 3, 2025

Area of Science:

Minimally Invasive Surgery
Endoscopic Technology
Retroperitoneal Organ Procedures

Background:

Advancements in endoscopic technology drive the development of minimally invasive procedures.
The retroperitoneal space offers a less explored but potentially advantageous surgical corridor.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the transperitoneal and retroperitoneoscopic approaches for retroperitoneal organs.
To review the advantages, complications, and limitations of the retroperitoneoscopic approach.

Main Methods:

Systematic analysis of studies comparing transperitoneal and retroperitoneoscopic approaches.
Review of literature on endoscopic retroperitoneal surgery.

Main Results:

The retroperitoneoscopic approach offers specific benefits in certain retroperitoneal procedures.
Common complications and factors hindering wider adoption are identified.

Conclusions:

The choice between transperitoneal and retroperitoneoscopic approaches depends on the specific procedure and patient factors.
Further research is needed to optimize retroperitoneoscopic techniques and overcome current limitations.