Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

45.1K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
45.1K
Factors Influencing Attraction I: Proximity01:22

Factors Influencing Attraction I: Proximity

182
Proximity plays a fundamental role in shaping interpersonal attraction by increasing opportunities for interaction and fostering familiarity. Research consistently demonstrates that individuals are more likely to form social bonds with those who are physically closer to them, whether in residential settings, workplaces, or educational institutions. This effect is largely driven by the increased frequency of encounters, which facilitates the development of friendships and romantic...
182
The Pauli Exclusion Principle03:06

The Pauli Exclusion Principle

58.5K
The arrangement of electrons in the orbitals of an atom is called its electron configuration. We describe an electron configuration with a symbol that contains three pieces of information:
58.5K
Factors Influencing Attraction IV: Reciprocity01:28

Factors Influencing Attraction IV: Reciprocity

174
Reciprocity in attraction is fundamental to social and romantic relationships, shaping how individuals form and maintain connections. The psychological principle underlying this phenomenon is that people tend to like those who express liking toward them. Balance theory supports this tendency, suggesting that mutual attraction fosters psychological harmony, whereas one-sided affection leads to discomfort and cognitive dissonance.The Psychological Mechanisms Behind ReciprocityWhen individuals...
174
Real Number Operations01:27

Real Number Operations

174
The concept of real numbers includes all the values that can be represented on a continuous number line. The system began with basic counting values used for enumeration. It later expanded to include values that represent the absence of quantity and opposites of the counting values. When situations required expressing parts of a whole or dividing quantities evenly, values capable of representing such proportions were developed. When written using decimal notation, these values can end or repeat...
174
Second Uniqueness Theorem01:16

Second Uniqueness Theorem

2.6K
Consider a region consisting of several individual conductors with a definite charge density in the region between these conductors. The second uniqueness theorem states that if the total charge on each conductor and the charge density in the in-between region are known, then the electric field can be uniquely determined.
In contrast, consider that the electric field is non-unique and apply Gauss's law in divergence form in the region between the conductors and the integral form to the surface...
2.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Looking Forward and Looking Back: The Likelihood of an Event's Future Reoccurrence Affects Perceptions of the Time It Occurred in the Past.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2016
Same author

Actors conform, observers react: the effects of behavioral synchrony on conformity.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2014
Same author

When does playing hard to get increase romantic attraction?

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2013
Same author

The art and science of guessing.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2011
Same author

Wanting, liking, and preference construction.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2010
Same author

The value heuristic in judgments of relative frequency.

Psychological science·2008
Same journal

Outgroup friendships and social influence in the development of adolescent attitudes toward secondary outgroups.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same journal

The impact of "relational" Artificial Intelligence on human well-being: A self-determination theory analysis.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same journal

Is my loneliness killing me? Effects of loneliness and social isolation on transitions between cognitive status categories and death.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same journal

Listening across the divide: High-quality listening promotes speakers' state well-being through basic psychological need satisfaction during disagreements.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same journal

Morality cut both ways: The role of cognition and emotion in attitude moralization and demoralization.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same journal

The predictive validity of vocational interests for life outcomes across adulthood.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 22, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.5K

The friend number paradox.

Kao Si1, Xianchi Dai2, Robert S Wyer2

  • 1Department of Management and Marketing.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
|May 1, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People incorrectly predict that having many friends increases attractiveness. In reality, individuals prefer friends with fewer connections, highlighting a paradox in social networking and friendship formation.

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.7K
Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

5.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 22, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.5K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.7K
Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

5.5K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Network Science
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Individuals often misjudge social cues in forming relationships.
  • The perceived value of social capital can influence interpersonal attraction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and explain the 'friend number paradox' in social interactions.
  • To investigate the discrepancy between predicted and actual friendship preferences.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted a series of studies, including three speed-friending experiments.
  • Examined participants' preferences for potential friends based on their number of existing connections.
  • Assessed participants' predictions of others' preferences.

Main Results:

  • A significant mismatch was found between individuals' predicted and personal preferences for friends.
  • Participants believed a large number of friends enhances attractiveness, but preferred friends with fewer connections.
  • A high number of friends was perceived as social capital but can signal social liabilities.

Conclusions:

  • The study reveals a paradox in friendship formation, where perceived social capital differs from actual preference.
  • Understanding this paradox is crucial for navigating social dynamics and optimizing relationship building.
  • The findings have implications for social network analysis and the psychology of attraction.