Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 22, 2025

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
Published on: April 8, 2020
Probabilistic performance estimators for computational chemistry methods: Systematic improvement probability and
Pascal Pernot1, Andreas Savin2
1Institut de Chimie Physique, UMR8000, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 91405 Orsay, France.
Abstract:
In Paper I [P. Pernot and A. Savin, J. Chem. Phys. 152, 164108 (2020)], we introduced the systematic improvement probability as a tool to assess the level of improvement on absolute errors to be expected when switching between two computational chemistry methods. We also developed two indicators based on robust statistics to address the uncertainty of ranking in computational chemistry benchmarks: Pinv, the inversion probability between two values of a statistic, and Pr, the ranking probability matrix. In this second part, these indicators are applied to nine data sets extracted from the recent benchmarking literature. We also illustrate how the correlation between the error sets might contain useful information on the benchmark dataset quality, notably when experimental data are used as reference.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Estimation of the Physical Quantities
Uncertainty: Overview
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

