Production responses to rumen-protected choline and methionine supplemented during the periparturient period differ...

The objective of this experiment was to examine production performance responses to feeding rumen-protected choline (RPC) or methionine (RPM), or both, during the periparturient period. Fifty-four Holstein cows (25 primiparous, 29 multiparous) were used in a randomized block design experiment with a 2 × 2 factorial treatment structure. Cows were blocked by expected calving date and parity and assigned to 1 of 4 treatments: CON (no RPC or RPM); RPC (13.0 g/d of choline ion); RPM (9 g/d of dl-methionine prepartum; 13.5 g/d of dl-methionine postpartum); or RPC + RPM. Treatments were applied once daily as a top-dress from 3 wk before through 5 wk after calving. Dry matter intake and milk production were recorded daily, and milk samples were obtained once weekly. Data were analyzed for primi- and multiparous cows separately, using a repeated-measures mixed model that included random effects of cow and block and fixed effects of RPC, RPM, week, and their interactions; week served as the repeated effect. Initial BW and previous lactation milk yield were included as covariates in the statistical model for multiparous cows. Feeding RPC without RPM increased milk yield for multiparous cows by 8.7 kg/d, but this increase was not observed when RPC was fed with RPM. In multiparous cows, feeding RPM increased milk fat concentration and tended to increase milk fat yield. Because of this, RPM increased fat-corrected milk (FCM) by 2.8 kg/d at wk 2 postpartum, and this increase was sustained through wk 5 postpartum. In contrast, RPM did not affect overall milk fat yield and concentration for primiparous cows. Feeding RPC increased milk yield for primiparous cows by 3.5 kg/d irrespective of RPM inclusion, which is contrary to observations in multiparous cows, where RPC increased milk yield only in the absence of RPM. These results indicate that responses to RPC during the periparturient period may be dependent upon supply of methionine. Our observations also demonstrate that primi- and multiparous cows respond differently to RPC and RPM supplemented individually or simultaneously during the periparturient period. This variation in response could have been mediated by putative differences in choline and methionine requirements of primiparous versus multiparous cows, or by differences in the levels of milk production between the 2 groups (36 vs. 25 kg of FCM/d). However, cows in this study did not experience severe negative energy balance (mean nadirs of -6.6 and -5.0 Mcal/d for multiparous and primiparous cows, respectively), which likely affected their responses to RPC and RPM.