Best Practices for Preclinical In Vivo Testing of Cancer Nanomedicines

Danielle M Valcourt1, Chintan H Kapadia1, Mackenzie A Scully1

  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, 161 Colburn Lab, Newark, DE, 19716, USA.

Insights

Implementing standardized preclinical testing and quality control for cancer nanomedicines can improve clinical trial success rates. This guideline focuses on best practices for evaluating nanomedicines in animal models to enhance translation.

Area of Science:

  • Nanomedicine
  • Oncology
  • Preclinical Research

Background:

  • Cancer nanomedicines show promise in preclinical studies but frequently fail in clinical trials.
  • High failure rates necessitate improved preclinical evaluation strategies for nanomedicines.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a guideline for best practices in the preclinical evaluation of nanomedicines for cancer treatment.
  • To reduce the clinical translation failure rate of cancer nanomedicines through standardized testing.

Main Methods:

  • Discusses recommended experiments and data collection for nanomedicine evaluation.
  • Outlines relevant murine tumor models and nanoparticle administration routes.
  • Summarizes essential controls for in vivo studies and animal welfare considerations.

Main Results:

  • Defines stringent criteria for testing and quality control in nanomedicine development.
  • Highlights the importance of carefully planned preclinical studies in relevant animal models.
  • Provides an overview of steps for US Food and Drug Administration approval post-animal studies.

Conclusions:

  • Adoption of these best practices is expected to improve the clinical translation of cancer nanomedicines.
  • Standardized in vivo testing protocols are crucial for the successful development of nanomedicines.
  • This report serves as a guide for effective preclinical evaluation of nanomedicines in oncology.