Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 22, 2025

A Comprehensive Procedure to Evaluate the In Vivo Performance of Cancer Nanomedicines
Published on: March 4, 2017
Best Practices for Preclinical In Vivo Testing of Cancer Nanomedicines
Danielle M Valcourt1, Chintan H Kapadia1, Mackenzie A Scully1
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, 161 Colburn Lab, Newark, DE, 19716, USA.
Abstract:
Significant advances have been made in the development of nanoparticles for cancer treatment in recent years. Despite promising results in preclinical animal models, cancer nanomedicines often fail in clinical trials. This failure rate could be reduced by defining stringent criteria for testing and quality control during the design and development stages, and by performing carefully planned preclinical studies in relevant animal models. This article discusses best practices for the evaluation of nanomedicines in murine tumor models. First, a recommended set of experiments to perform is introduced, including discussion of the types of data to collect during these studies. This is followed by an outline of various tumor models and their clinical relevance. Next, different routes of nanoparticle administration are overviewed, followed by a summary of important controls to include in in vivo studies of nanomedicine. Finally, animal welfare considerations are discussed, and an overview of the steps involved in achieving US Food and Drug Administration approval after animal studies are completed is provided. Researchers should use this report as a guideline for effective preclinical evaluation of cancer nanomedicine. As the community adopts best practices for in vivo testing, the rate of clinical translation of cancer nanomedicines is likely to improve.
Insights
Implementing standardized preclinical testing and quality control for cancer nanomedicines can improve clinical trial success rates. This guideline focuses on best practices for evaluating nanomedicines in animal models to enhance translation.
Area of Science:
- Nanomedicine
- Oncology
- Preclinical Research
Background:
- Cancer nanomedicines show promise in preclinical studies but frequently fail in clinical trials.
- High failure rates necessitate improved preclinical evaluation strategies for nanomedicines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a guideline for best practices in the preclinical evaluation of nanomedicines for cancer treatment.
- To reduce the clinical translation failure rate of cancer nanomedicines through standardized testing.
Main Methods:
- Discusses recommended experiments and data collection for nanomedicine evaluation.
- Outlines relevant murine tumor models and nanoparticle administration routes.
- Summarizes essential controls for in vivo studies and animal welfare considerations.
Main Results:
- Defines stringent criteria for testing and quality control in nanomedicine development.
- Highlights the importance of carefully planned preclinical studies in relevant animal models.
- Provides an overview of steps for US Food and Drug Administration approval post-animal studies.
Conclusions:
- Adoption of these best practices is expected to improve the clinical translation of cancer nanomedicines.
- Standardized in vivo testing protocols are crucial for the successful development of nanomedicines.
- This report serves as a guide for effective preclinical evaluation of nanomedicines in oncology.
Related Concept Videos
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
Preclinical Development: Overview

