Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 22, 2025

Flow Cytometry to Estimate Leukemia Stem Cells in Primary Acute Myeloid Leukemia and in Patient-derived-xenografts, at Diagnosis and Follow Up
Published on: March 26, 2018
The sensitivity of the FLT3-ITD detection method is an important consideration when diagnosing acute myeloid leukemia
Masahiro Sakaguchi1, Nana Nakajima1, Hiroki Yamaguchi1
1Department of Hematology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract:
Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) is a key predictive factor for the prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We compared the detection sensitivity of fragment analysis with that of PCR-electrophoresis using MV4-11 (FLT3-ITD) and NKM-1 (FLT3-wild type) cell lines. DNA of these cells was mixed at different ratios and subjected to PCR-electrophoresis or fragment analysis. PCR-electrophoresis was found to have an FLT3-ITD allelic ratio (AR) detection limit of 0.034-0.072. Visual inspection of the PCR-electrophoresis revealed a lower detection sensitivity than that of fragment analysis. Therefore, it is essential to conduct fragment analysis when screening for FLT3-ITD.
Insights
Fragment analysis offers superior detection sensitivity for fms-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) in acute myeloid leukemia compared to PCR-electrophoresis, crucial for accurate prognostic assessment.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Molecular Biology
- Oncology
Background:
- Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) is a critical prognostic marker in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
- Accurate detection of FLT3-ITD is essential for patient stratification and treatment decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the detection sensitivity of fragment analysis versus PCR-electrophoresis for FLT3-ITD.
- To determine the optimal method for reliable FLT3-ITD screening in AML.
Main Methods:
- Utilized MV4-11 (FLT3-ITD positive) and NKM-1 (FLT3 wild-type) cell lines.
- Mixed DNA samples at varying ratios.
- Performed PCR-electrophoresis and fragment analysis for FLT3-ITD detection.
Main Results:
- PCR-electrophoresis exhibited an FLT3-ITD allelic ratio (AR) detection limit between 0.034-0.072.
- Visual inspection of PCR-electrophoresis showed lower sensitivity than fragment analysis.
- Fragment analysis demonstrated higher sensitivity in detecting low allelic ratios of FLT3-ITD.
Conclusions:
- Fragment analysis is essential for sensitive and reliable screening of FLT3-ITD in AML.
- Fragment analysis provides superior detection capabilities compared to traditional PCR-electrophoresis for FLT3-ITD mutations.

