[Misclassification and not evidence-based reassurances: the SENTIERI study on congenital anomalies in Brindisi]
Emilio Gianicolo1, Maria Grazia Andreassi2, Antonella Bruni3
1Institut für Medizinische Biometrie, Epidemiologie und Informatik der Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutemberg-Universität, Mainz, Germania; emilio.gianicolo@uni-mainz.de.
Epidemiologia E Prevenzione
|May 7, 2020
Abstract
No abstract available in PubMed .
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
1.1K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
1.1K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
503
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
503


