Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 22, 2025

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Screening for atrial fibrillation and other arrhythmias in primary care
Kam Cheong Wong1,2,3,4, Cindy Kok5, Simone Marschner6
1Westmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia. kam.wong@sydney.edu.au.
Insights
Most general practitioners (GPs) screen for atrial fibrillation (AF) and other arrhythmias, but awareness of AF guidelines is low. GPs are interested in training for ECG interpretation and mobile health devices to improve arrhythmia detection.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- General Practice
- Digital Health
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) and other arrhythmias are common in general practice.
- The Australian AF Guidelines were published in 2018 to assist general practitioners (GPs) in diagnosis and management.
- Understanding current AF screening practices among Australian GPs is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the proportion of GPs performing AF screening and their methods.
- To assess GPs' awareness of AF guidelines and arrhythmia screening approaches.
- To evaluate the role of ECG and mobile health devices, and GPs' training needs.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional online survey (GPSAFER) was conducted among Australian GPs.
- Participants were recruited via GP networks.
- Data were collected from October 2018 to March 2019.
Main Results:
- 85.1% of GPs performed AF screening, primarily using pulse palpation.
- Only 37.8% of GPs were aware of the Australian AF Guidelines; awareness correlated with higher screening rates.
- Most GPs were confident in ECG interpretation but desired further training and were considering mobile ECG devices.
Conclusions:
- Arrhythmia assessment is frequent in general practice.
- GPs are receptive to training in ECG interpretation and adopting mobile ECG devices.
- Enhancing guideline awareness and ECG interpretation confidence may boost AF screening rates.
Background:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) and other arrhythmias are prevalent and often encountered by general practitioners (GPs). In response to the growing prevalence and to assist practitioners in the diagnosis and management of AF, the Cardiac Society of Australia & New Zealand and Heart Foundation of Australia published the first Australian AF Guidelines in 2018. We aimed to examine (a) the proportion of GPs who performed any form of AF screening and identify the methods they applied, (b) GPs' awareness of the AF Guidelines and approaches to arrhythmia screening, (c) the roles of conventional 12-lead ECG and mobile health devices, and (d) GPs' confidence in ECG interpretation and need for training.
Methods:
A cross-sectional online survey titled "GPs Screen their patients for Atrial Fibrillation and othEr aRrhythmia (GPSAFER)" was conducted from October 2018 to March 2019. The participants were recruited via various GP networks across Australia. Ethics approval was granted by The University of Sydney.
Results:
A total of 463 surveys were completed. Many GPs (394/463, 85.1%, 95% CI 81.5-88.2%) performed some forms of AF screening and applied at least one AF screening method, most frequently pulse palpation (389/463, 84.0%). Some (299/463, 64.6%) GPs considered assessing their patients for other arrhythmias (237/299, 79.3% for complete heart block and 236/299, 78.9% for long-QT). Most GPs (424/463, 91.6%) were not using mobile ECG devices in their practice but some (147/463, 31.7%) were contemplating it. One third (175/463, 37.8%) of GPs were aware of the Australian AF Guidelines; those aware were more likely to perform AF screening (98.9% vs 76.7%, p < 0.001). Factors significantly and positively associated with AF screening were "awareness of the AF Guidelines" (p < 0.001), "number of years working in general practice" (p < 0.001), and "confidence in ECG interpretation of AF" (p = 0.003). Most GPs reported that they were very or extremely confident in interpreting AF (381/463, 82.3%) and complete heart block (266/463, 57.5%). Many GPs (349/463, 75.4%) would like to receive online ECG interpretation training.
Conclusions:
Assessment of arrhythmias is common in general practice and GPs are open to further training in ECG interpretation and using mobile ECG devices to aid their clinical practice. Increasing awareness of AF Guidelines and improving confidence in ECG interpretation may increase AF screening.
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Dysrhythmias VII: Nursing Management of Dysrhythmias

