Stability of the gross motor function classification system in children with cerebral palsy for two years

Eun-Young Park1

  • 1Department of Secondary Special Education, College of Education, Jeonju University, 1200 3-ga, Hyoja-dong, Wansan-gu, Jeonju, 560-759, Republic of Korea. eunyoung@jj.ac.kr.

BMC Neurology
|May 8, 2020
PubMed

Insights

The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) shows good stability over two years for children with cerebral palsy (CP) aged 5-12 years. However, younger children (2-4 years) may experience changes, necessitating periodic GMFCS reassessments.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Neurology
  • Rehabilitation Medicine

Background:

  • Gross motor function prognosis is crucial for pediatric cerebral palsy (CP) interventions.
  • The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) aids professional-family communication and is actively studied.
  • Understanding GMFCS stability is vital for effective therapeutic planning in children with CP.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the stability of the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) over a two-year period in children diagnosed with cerebral palsy (CP).
  • To investigate the influence of age on GMFCS stability in children with CP.
  • To provide evidence-based recommendations for GMFCS assessment frequency.

Main Methods:

  • The GMFCS levels of 100 children with CP (aged 2-12 years) were assessed at three time points.
  • Participants were undergoing rehabilitation or attending special elementary schools in South Korea.
  • Statistical analysis using weighted kappa coefficients was employed to determine inter-rater reliability and stability.

Main Results:

  • Statistically significant weighted kappa coefficients (p < .05) indicated overall GMFCS stability.
  • Coefficients ranged from 0.690 to 0.789 for children aged 2-12 years, suggesting good reliability.
  • A lower coefficient (0.557) was observed in the 2-4 year age group between the first and third measurements, indicating potential for change.

Conclusions:

  • GMFCS demonstrated stability for the first year, with potential for changes during the second year, particularly in younger children (2-4 years).
  • GMFCS stability is influenced by time, duration of assessment, and the child's age.
  • Periodic GMFCS assessments are recommended, with increased necessity for children aged 2-4 years to track functional changes accurately.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos