Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 22, 2025

Frailty Assessment in an Aging Mouse Model
Published on: September 23, 2025
Translation of the Frailty Paradigm from Older Adults to Children with Cardiac Disease
Chaitanya Panchangam1,2, David A White3,4, Suma Goudar3,4
1Department of Child Health, University of Missouri Health Care, Columbia, MO, USA. panchangams@health.missouri.edu.
Insights
Children with cardiac disease (CCD) show significant deficits in all five frailty domains compared to healthy peers. This study quantifies frailty in CCD, highlighting a need for further research into its predictive value for health outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Gerontology
- Clinical Assessment
Background:
- Children and adolescents with cardiac disease (CCD) experience significant morbidity and reduced quality of life.
- Currently, no widely applicable tools exist to assess functional phenotypes, encompassing physical capability and psychosocial well-being, in CCD, unlike the established frailty scores for the elderly.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the specific domains of frailty within the pediatric and adolescent cardiac disease population.
- To establish whether frailty domains can be quantified using developmentally appropriate methods in CCD.
- To compare frailty domain performance between CCD and age- and gender-matched healthy controls.
Main Methods:
- Prospective recruitment of 34 children and adolescents with cardiac disease (ages 8-17.5) and 22 healthy controls.
- Assessment of five frailty domains: slowness (6-min walk test), weakness (handgrip strength), exhaustion (multidimensional fatigue scale), body composition (height, weight, BMI, skinfold thickness), and physical activity (pediatric activity questionnaire).
- Utilized age- and gender-based population norms to derive Z scores and percentiles for each measurement, followed by two-tailed t-tests for group comparisons.
Main Results:
- The CCD group demonstrated significantly worse performance across all five assessed frailty domains compared to healthy controls.
- Specific significant differences were observed in the 6-min walk test (slowness), handgrip strength (weakness), fatigue scale scores (exhaustion), and various body composition and physical activity metrics.
- These findings support the concept that frailty domains can be quantified in children and adolescents with cardiac disease.
Conclusions:
- Frailty domains are quantifiable in children and adolescents with cardiac disease using developmentally appropriate methods.
- Children and adolescents with cardiac disease exhibit significant deficits in all five frailty domains when compared to healthy controls.
- Larger, longitudinal studies are warranted to further investigate frailty in CCD and its potential to predict adverse health outcomes.
Abstract:
Children and adolescents with cardiac disease (CCD) have significant morbidity and lower quality of life. However, there are no broadly applicable tools similar to the frailty score as described in the elderly, to define functional phenotype in terms of physical capability and psychosocial wellbeing in CCD. The purpose of this study is to investigate the domains of the frailty in CCD. We prospectively recruited CCD (8-17.5 years old, 70% single ventricle, 27% heart failure, 12% pulmonary hypertension; NYHA classes I, II and III) and age and gender matched healthy controls (total n = 56; CCD n = 34, controls n = 22; age 12.6 ± 2.6 years; 39.3% female). We measured the five domains of frailty: slowness, weakness, exhaustion, body composition and physical activity using developmentally appropriate methods. Age and gender-based population norms were used to obtain Z scores and percentiles for each measurement. Two-tailed t-tests were used to compare the two groups. The CCD group performed significantly worse in all five domains of frailty compared to healthy controls. Slowness: 6-min walk test with Z score -3.9 ± 1.3 vs -1.4 ± 1.3, p < 0.001; weakness: handgrip strength percentile 18.9 ± 20.9 vs 57.9 ± 26.0, p < 0.001; exhaustion: multidimensional fatigue scale percentile 63.7 ± 13.5 vs 83.3 ± 14.4, p < 0.001; body composition: height percentile 43.4 ± 29.5 vs 71.4 ± 25.2, p < 0.001, weight percentile 46.0 ± 36.0 vs 70.9 ± 24.3, p = 0.006, BMI percentile 48.4 ± 35.5 vs 66.9 ± 24.2, p = 0.04, triceps skinfold thickness 41.0 ± 24.0 vs 54.4 ± 22.1, p = 0.04; physical activity: pediatric activity questionnaire score 2 ± 0.6 vs 2.7 ± 0.6, p < 0.001. The domains of frailty can be quantified in children using developmentally appropriate methods. CCD differ significantly from controls in all five domains, supporting the concept of quantifying the domains of frailty. Larger longitudinal studies are needed to study frailty in CCD and examine if it predicts adverse health outcomes.Clinical Trial Registration: The ClinicalTrials.gov identification number is NCT02999438. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02999438.
More Related Videos
04:00Author Spotlight: Assessing Surgical Frailty with Point-of-Care Ultrasound of Quadriceps Muscles
Published on: July 26, 2024
05:53Measuring Frailty in HIV-infected Individuals. Identification of Frail Patients is the First Step to Amelioration and Reversal of Frailty
Published on: July 24, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Cardiac Performance
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Excretion
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy