Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 22, 2025

X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging
Published on: September 11, 2011
The Impact of Novel X-Ray Systems and X-Ray System Optimization on Patient Radiation Dose Administered During Cardiac
Evangelia Vemmou, Ilias Nikolakopoulos, Iosif Xenogiannis
1Minneapolis Heart Institute, 920 East 28th Street #300, Minneapolis, MN 55407 USA. esbrilakis@gmail.com.
Introduction:
The effect of x-ray system optimization on patient radiation dose has received limited study.
Methods:
We analyzed patient radiation dose in 1786 cardiac catheterization procedures (diagnostic coronary angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) performed at a single tertiary-care center before and after x-ray system optimization.
Results:
After optimization, cineangiography dose-area product (DAP) dose was lower in the overall group of patients who underwent diagnostic angiography and/or PCI (1347 μGy•m² [IQR, 645-2345 μGy•m²] vs 1658 μGy•m² [IQR, 640- 2757 μGy•m²]; P=.03), as well as in the diagnostic angiography group (1795 μGy•m² [IQR, 1140-2994 μGy•m²] vs 2356 μGy•m² [IQR, 311-3576 μGy•m²]; P<.01) and PCI group (2152 μGy•m² [IQR, 1338-3477 μGy•m²] vs 2562 μGy•m² [IQR, 1681-3859 μGy•m²]; P=.02). Cineangiography DAP per exposure was also lower in the overall group (143 μGy•m² [IQR, 91-212 μGy•m²] vs 164 μGy•m² [IQR, 106-233 μGy•m²] per exposure; P<.01) and in the diagnostic angiography group (158 μGy•m² [IQR, 102-225 μGy•m²] vs 184 μGy•m² [IQR, 125-271 μGy•m²] per exposure; P<.01). After optimization, cineangiography air kerma (AK) dose (319 mGy [IQR, 197-531 mGy] vs 421 mGy [IQR, 241-600 mGy]; P=.01) and cineangiography AK per exposure (20.7 mGy [IQR, 12.9-29.0 mGy] vs 23.6 mGy [IQR, 14.1-32.9 mGy] per exposure; P=.03) were also lower in the PCI group. There was no significant change in fluoroscopy AK dose after optimization (20.7 mGy [IQR, 12.7-30.1 mGy] vs 20.4 mGy [IQR, 12.8-31.3 mGy] per minute; P=.71) and fluoroscopy DAP dose (156 μGy•m² [IQR, 101-242 μGy•m²] vs 156 μGy•m² [IQR, 102-236 μGy•m²] per minute; P=.91).
Conclusion:
X-ray system optimization was associated with lower cineangiography DAP, but similar fluoroscopy radiation dose.
More Related Videos
10:46Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology
Published on: May 26, 2015
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT