Intramuscular Versus Buccal Midazolam for Pediatric Seizures: A Randomized Double-Blinded Trial

Khalid Alansari1, Magda Barkat2, AbdelNasir H Mohamed2

  • 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar; Weill Cornell Medicine - Qatar, Doha, Qatar.

Pediatric Neurology
|May 11, 2020
PubMed

Insights

Intramuscular midazolam is a favorable first-line treatment for pediatric seizures compared to buccal midazolam. This study found intramuscular midazolam to be more effective and safer for active seizures in children.

Area of Science:

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Pediatric Neurology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Active seizures in children require prompt and effective first-line treatment.
  • Midazolam is a commonly used medication for seizure management.
  • Comparing different administration routes is crucial for optimizing pediatric emergency care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy and safety of intramuscular versus buccal midazolam as first-line treatment for active seizures in pediatric patients.
  • To evaluate seizure cessation rates, need for additional medication, seizure duration, and adverse events.

Main Methods:

  • A double-blind, double-dummy randomized trial was conducted.
  • 150 children with active seizures lasting over five minutes were enrolled.
  • Primary outcome was seizure cessation within five minutes of drug administration; secondary outcomes included need for additional medication, seizure duration, and side effects.

Main Results:

  • Seizure cessation occurred in 61% of the intramuscular group versus 46% of the buccal group (P=0.07).
  • Fewer patients required additional anti-seizure treatment in the intramuscular group (39%) compared to the buccal group (51%).
  • One patient in the intramuscular group experienced respiratory depression and hypotension; no side effects were attributed to buccal midazolam.

Conclusions:

  • Intramuscular midazolam demonstrates favorable efficacy and safety compared to buccal midazolam for first-line treatment of pediatric seizures.
  • Intramuscular administration may be a more effective route for rapid seizure control in children.
  • Further research could explore optimal dosing and patient selection for each administration route.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Drug Delivery: Enteral Route01:18

Drug Delivery: Enteral Route

The enteral drug administration involves three primary routes: oral, sublingual, and buccal. Oral ingestion is the most prevalent, safe, economical, and convenient method for drug administration. However, it has certain drawbacks, including limited absorption due to the drug's low water solubility or poor membrane permeability, possible emesis from GI mucosa irritation, destruction of drugs by digestive enzymes or low gastric pH, and irregular absorption along with food or other drugs.
1.4K
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview01:24

Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview

Intravenous anesthetics are drugs administered parenterally to induce anesthesia or sedation. Propofol is a widely used agent formulated as a 1% emulsion in soybean oil, glycerol, and egg phosphatide. It induces rapid anesthesia primarily due to its rapid distribution from the bloodstream to target tissues and is metabolized in the liver. However, it can cause significant pain on injection and hypertriglyceridemia. Fospropofol, a water-based prodrug of propofol, lacks these adverse effects.
503
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics01:19

Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics

Depolarizing blockers are administered through intravenous injection. Succinylcholine is the most common choice of depolarizing blockers in emergency clinical practices. Although they have a rapid onset, they readily diffuse away from the motor end plate into the extracellular fluid. They are metabolized by enzymes such as liver butyrylcholinesterase and plasma pseudocholinesterases. This produces a short duration of action, typically 5-10 minutes long, unlike nondepolarizing blockers, which...
522
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children01:29

Drug Dosing: Infants and Children

Pediatric patient dosages diverge from adults due to disparities in body surface area, total body water, and extracellular fluid per kilogram of body weight. The dosing regimen considers the variations in pharmacokinetics and pharmacology across distinct age groups, encompassing preterm newborns, infants, young children, older children, and adolescents. Calculation of pediatric patient doses is predicated on determining body surface area, which exhibits a superior correlation with the child's...
172
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption01:23

Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption

Understanding the physiological differences in the pediatric population is crucial for effective pharmacotherapy. Neonates, infants, and children exhibit significant variations in gastric pH, gastric emptying time, intestinal transit time, and biliary function. These variations profoundly affect oral drug absorption, necessitating a nuanced approach to pediatric dosing.Neonates present with a unique physiological profile, having a gastric pH greater than 4 and faster and more irregular gastric...
169