Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 21, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
COVID-19 and Moral Imperialism in Multinational Clinical Research
Fernando Hellmann1, Bryn Williams-Jones2, Volnei Garrafa3
1Department of Public Health, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Campus Universitário Reitor João David Ferreira Lima, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Abstract:
A TV debate in April 2020 between two French doctors regarding the benefits of testing a coronavirus vaccine in Africa where there are no masks or treatments available has led to international criticism. This case highlights a problematic ethical double standard in multinational clinical research: trials that would be considered unethical in high income countries (e.g., placebo-controlled where there is an existing treatment) are nonetheless justified in low-and-middle-income countries because the existing standards of care are less (i.e., no access to a treatment). Underlying this ethical double standard in some multinational clinical trials is a moral imperialism and persistent colonialist thinking that must be rejected.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Clinical Trials: Overview
Ethics and Bioethics

