Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Blinding

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.

Randomized Experiments

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

Clinical Trials

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Do they work, and are they worth it? Proposing a framework of evidence synthesis for guiding the evidence-based use of add-ons in <i>in vitro</i> fertilisation.

Human fertility (Cambridge, England)·2026

Same author

Reply: Reconsidering the interpretation of sperm DNA fragmentation testing in ART decision-making.

Human reproduction open·2026

Same author

Does intracytoplasmic sperm injection outperform conventional in vitro fertilization in couples without severe male factor infertility? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2026

Same author

Re-evaluating endometrial injury for IVF: was a promising approach abandoned prematurely? A critical review.

Reproductive biomedicine online·2026

Same author

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) pretreatment duration and letrozole supplementation for optimizing live birth rates in women with adenomyosis undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer (GOLD-FET): study protocol for a multicenter, 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial in China.

Trials·2026

Same author

Prediction of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury in Nulliparous Women: Model Development and Temporal Validation.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 21, 2025

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

Integrity of randomized controlled trials: challenges and solutions.

Wentao Li¹, Madelon van Wely², Lyle Gurrin³

¹Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.

Fertility and Sterility

|May 11, 2020

Summary

Ensuring integrity in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is crucial for patient safety and reliable medical evidence. Statistical methods and improved publication practices are key to detecting and preventing research misconduct in RCTs.

Keywords:

Fabrication falsification meta-analysis randomized clinical trial research integrity

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research

Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research

Published on: January 5, 2024

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 21, 2025

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research

Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research

Published on: January 5, 2024

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Area of Science:

Clinical Trials
Medical Research Integrity
Biostatistics

Background:

Compromised integrity in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) poses a significant threat to patient safety and the reliability of medical evidence.
The publication-driven research environment contributes to integrity issues, exacerbated by inadequate measures for misconduct prevention and detection.
Compromised RCTs negatively impact the validity of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which rely on high-quality trial data.

Purpose of the Study:

To highlight the critical importance of assessing and ensuring data integrity in RCTs.
To discuss the role of statistical methods in identifying research misconduct within RCTs.
To advocate for reforms in the research publication system to address compromised RCTs.

Main Methods:

Assessment of RCT integrity across three domains: general evaluation, analysis of summary data, and individual participant data checks.
Application of statistical methods to detect evidence of data fabrication or falsification.
Review of current policies like prospective registration and the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement.

Main Results:

Statistical methods are vital tools for identifying data manipulation patterns in RCTs.
Existing efforts to prevent and disclose research misconduct in RCTs are insufficient.
There is a need for developing and validating advanced statistical methods for detecting data integrity issues.

Conclusions:

Strengthening RCT integrity is essential to maintain the credibility of medical research and protect patients.
Implementing prospective registration and CONSORT guidelines should be strictly enforced.
Reforming the publication submission, review, and publication system is necessary for timely investigation and retraction of compromised RCTs.
Systematic review authors must be vigilant about the impact of compromised RCTs on evidence synthesis and actively combat research misconduct.