Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
Published on: June 26, 2013
The propensity interpretation of probability and diagnostic split in explaining away.
Marko Tešić1, Alice Liefgreen2, David Lagnado2
1Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HX, UK.
People often fail to sufficiently explain away competing causes for an effect. This study suggests this cognitive bias stems from interpreting probabilities as propensities and using a
Area of Science:
- Cognitive psychology
- Decision-making
- Causal reasoning
Background:
- Explaining-away situations, where multiple causes compete for an effect, are common.
- Previous research shows people 'insufficiently' explain away competing causes.
- Existing theories struggle to fully account for this observed insufficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate novel explanations for insufficient explaining away.
- To test if interpreting probabilities as propensities drives this bias.
- To examine if a 'diagnostic split' strategy contributes to insufficient explaining away.
Main Methods:
- Manipulated cover story characteristics to vary the propensity interpretation of probability.
- Adjusted prior probabilities of causes to alter normative explaining away.
- Empirically tested participants' causal judgments in explaining-away scenarios.
Main Results:
- Confirmed the prevalent finding of insufficient explaining away.
- Found empirical support for the propensity interpretation hypothesis.
- Provided evidence for the 'diagnostic split' strategy as a contributing factor.
Conclusions:
- Interpreting probabilities as propensities and employing a 'diagnostic split' likely drive insufficient explaining away.
- These cognitive strategies offer a compelling explanation for previously observed results.
- Further research can explore interventions to mitigate these biases in causal reasoning.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Fundamental Attribution Error
Probability Laws
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...

