Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Use of In vivo Imaging to Monitor the Progression of Experimental Mouse Cytomegalovirus Infection in Neonates
Published on: July 6, 2013
Are routine genetic and urine cytomegalovirus testing useful investigations in symmetrically growth restricted
Predheeba Muthusamy1, Samantha Davies1, Eleftheria Ainley1
1Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton on Tees, UK.
Insights
Genetic testing in newborns, including those with growth restrictions, rarely reveals significant chromosomal abnormalities. This six-year study found a low positive rate, suggesting limited utility for routine genetic screening in these cases.
Area of Science:
- Medical Genetics
- Neonatal Care
- Pediatric Diagnostics
Background:
- Newborn genetic testing is crucial for identifying congenital disorders.
- Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) can be associated with genetic and chromosomal abnormalities.
- Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a common cause of congenital infections with potential long-term effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic yield of genetic testing in a large cohort of newborns.
- To assess the utility of genetic testing specifically in infants with symmetric intrauterine growth restriction.
- To determine the prevalence of positive urine CMV testing in newborns.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of genetic testing results over a six-year period.
- Inclusion criteria: 1118 newborns undergoing genetic testing, with a subset of 162 infants diagnosed with symmetric growth retardation.
- Urine cytomegalovirus (CMV) testing performed on 118 infants.
Main Results:
- Only six out of 1118 newborns (0.5%) had positive genetic testing results indicating significant chromosomal abnormalities.
- The odds ratio for positive genetic results in growth-retarded infants was low (0.21).
- One out of 118 infants tested positive for urine CMV.
Conclusions:
- Routine genetic testing in newborns, even those with symmetric growth restriction, demonstrates a low diagnostic yield for chromosomal abnormalities.
- The findings suggest that genetic testing may not be cost-effective for broad screening in this population.
- Urine CMV testing revealed a low prevalence in the studied cohort.
Abstract:
In this six-year study, there were 1118 newborn genetic testing; there were 162 genetic testing for symmetrically growth retarded infants. Out of this, only six infants had positive results yielding a low odds ratio of 0.21 for having any significant chromosome results. Urine CMV testing was positive only in one infant out of 118 tested.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion

