Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Glaucoma Classification Through SSVEP-Derived ON- and OFF-Pathway Features.

Translational vision science & technology·2026
Same author

Evidence That Cerebral Visual Impairment May Evolve after Initial Brain Injury.

Ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Steady-state EEG captures how elementary classroom instruction drives plasticity for novel visual words.

NPJ science of learning·2025
Same author

Strong mnemonic prediction errors increase cognitive control, attention, and arousal.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Cortical latency predicts reading fluency from late childhood to early adolescence.

Developmental cognitive neuroscience·2025
Same author

Medial temporal cortex supports object perception by integrating over visuospatial sequences.

Cognition·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Concurrent Recording of Co-localized Electroencephalography and Local Field Potential in Rodent
08:31

Concurrent Recording of Co-localized Electroencephalography and Local Field Potential in Rodent

Published on: November 30, 2017

12.7K

Time-resolved correspondences between deep neural network layers and EEG measurements in object processing.

Nathan C L Kong1, Blair Kaneshiro2, Daniel L K Yamins3

  • 1Department of Psychology, Stanford University, United States; Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, United States.

Vision Research
|May 11, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) mimic the brain's visual hierarchy. This study compares CNNs to human brain responses, finding some hierarchical alignment but also deviations, especially in early visual processing stages.

Keywords:
Convolutional neural networkEEGObject recognitionRepresentational similarity analysis

More Related Videos

Investigating Social Cognition in Infants and Adults Using Dense Array Electroencephalography dEEG
12:48

Investigating Social Cognition in Infants and Adults Using Dense Array Electroencephalography dEEG

Published on: June 27, 2011

18.2K
Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

15.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Concurrent Recording of Co-localized Electroencephalography and Local Field Potential in Rodent
08:31

Concurrent Recording of Co-localized Electroencephalography and Local Field Potential in Rodent

Published on: November 30, 2017

12.7K
Investigating Social Cognition in Infants and Adults Using Dense Array Electroencephalography dEEG
12:48

Investigating Social Cognition in Infants and Adults Using Dense Array Electroencephalography dEEG

Published on: June 27, 2011

18.2K
Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

15.0K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computer Science
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • The ventral visual stream exhibits hierarchical organization, processing simple features in early areas and complex features in higher areas.
  • Hierarchical convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are inspired by this brain organization and effectively model neural responses.
  • Understanding the temporal dynamics of human object processing through CNNs remains an active area of research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the correspondence between CNN representations and the temporal dynamics of human object processing.
  • To compare various similarity metrics and datasets for evaluating CNN model performance against brain activity.
  • To explore hierarchical relationships between CNN layers and brain responses over time.

Main Methods:

  • Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) was employed to compare CNN model representations with electroencephalography (EEG) data.
  • Two EEG datasets, comprising responses to 72 images, were analyzed.
  • Novel methods for optimally weighting CNN features were developed to enhance correlation with brain responses.

Main Results:

  • A hierarchical relationship was observed between CNN layer depth and peak correlation time with brain responses for specific similarity metrics.
  • Correlation onset times did not strictly follow a hierarchical pattern across CNN layers.
  • Deeper CNN layers showed better correspondence with later EEG responses, while shallow layers did not consistently outperform deeper layers for early EEG responses.

Conclusions:

  • CNNs partially capture the hierarchical temporal dynamics of human object processing, but deviations from strict hierarchy exist.
  • The findings suggest that while deeper CNN layers may model later stages of visual processing, early visual processing dynamics are not fully represented hierarchically.
  • This study provides a comprehensive comparison of CNNs against neural data, offering insights into the temporal aspects of visual object recognition.