Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with left ventricular assist device
Karthik Gonuguntla1, Shivaraj Patil2, Richard Gregory Cowden3
1Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Calhoun Cardiology Center University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA. karthikg.75@gmail.com.
Insights
Continuous flow-left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) have not reduced mortality in end-stage heart failure patients. Increased comorbidities and complications, such as kidney injury and sepsis, predict in-hospital mortality, necessitating improved patient selection for better outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Public Health
Background:
- Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are critical for managing end-stage heart failure.
- Continuous flow (CF)-LVAD technology represents an advancement in mechanical circulatory support.
- Understanding factors influencing in-hospital mortality post-LVAD implantation is crucial for patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of comorbidities and complications on in-hospital mortality following the introduction of CF-LVADs.
- To identify key predictors of mortality in patients receiving CF-LVADs.
- To assess trends in mortality and comorbidity prevalence over a 5-year period.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 2010 to 2014.
- Included 2,359 adult patients (≥18 years) who received an LVAD, identified via ICD-9 codes.
- Performed comparative and multivariate analyses to determine mortality predictors.
Main Results:
- In-hospital mortality rates remained consistent between 2010 and 2014.
- Significant predictors of mortality included hemodialysis, cerebrovascular disease, mechanical ventilation, mild liver disease, and acute kidney injury.
- Complications such as disseminated intravascular coagulation, sepsis, septic shock, and gastrointestinal bleeding were also associated with increased mortality.
Conclusions:
- CF-LVADs have not yet demonstrated a reduction in in-hospital mortality, potentially due to their use in patients with significant comorbid conditions.
- Comorbidities like kidney disease and cerebrovascular disease, along with complications like sepsis, are strong predictors of mortality.
- Future research should focus on refining patient selection criteria and mitigating post-procedural complications to improve outcomes.
Background:
A left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is used to support patients with end-stage heart failure.
Aims:
To examine the role of comorbidities and complications in predicting in-hospital mortality since the introduction of continuous flow (CF)-LVAD.
Methods:
The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried from 2010 to 2014 using International Classification of Disease-9 code for LVAD among patients 18 years or older. The sample consisted of 2,359 patients (mean age = 55 ± 13.7 years, 76.8% men, 59.3% Caucasian).
Results:
Comparative analysis revealed mortality did not differ from 2010 to 2014 (p = 0.653). Increases in comorbidities of atrial fibrillation, acute kidney injury, mechanical ventilation, body mass index ≥ 25, cerebrovascular disease, and mild liver disease were evidenced over the 5-year period (p values ≤ 0.049). Multivariate analysis showed that significant predictors of mortality were comorbid hemodialysis (AOR = 7.62, 95% CI [4.78, 12.27]), cerebrovascular disease (AOR = 5.38, 95% CI [3.49, 8.26]), mechanical ventilation (AOR = 3.83, 95% CI [2.84, 5.18]), mild liver disease (AOR = 1.96, 95% CI [1.38, 2.76]), and acute kidney injury (AOR = 1.62, 95% CI [1.16, 2.28]). Predictive complications included disseminated intravascular coagulation (AOR = 6.41, 95% CI [2.79, 6.84]), sepsis (AOR = 4.37, 95% CI [2.79, 6.84]), septic shock (AOR = 3.9, 95% CI [2.11, 7.59]), and gastrointestinal bleed (AOR = 1.81, 95% CI [1.11, 2.93]).
Conclusions:
CF-LVADs have not reduced mortality, possibly due to utilization in patients with comorbid conditions. Future trials are necessary for improved patient selection and reduced post-procedural complications.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

