Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Author Spotlight: Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients With a Digital Occupational Training System
Published on: December 29, 2023
Dose and setting of rehabilitation received after stroke in Queensland, Australia: a prospective cohort study
Rohan S Grimley1,2,3, Ingrid Cm Rosbergen3,4,5, Louise Gustafsson5,6
1Sunshine Coast Clinical School, Griffith University, Birtinya, QLD, Australia.
Objective:
The aims of this study were to describe patterns and dose of rehabilitation received following stroke and to investigate their relationship with outcomes.
Design:
This was a prospective observational cohort study.
Setting:
A total of seven public hospitals and all subsequent rehabilitation services in Queensland, Australia, participated in the study.
Subjects:
Participants were consecutive patients surviving acute stroke between July 2016 and January 2017.
Methods:
We tracked rehabilitation for six months following stroke and obtained 90- to 180-day outcomes from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry.
Measures:
Dose of rehabilitation - time in therapy by physiotherapy, occupational therapy and speech pathology; modified Rankin Scale (mRS)- premorbid, acute care discharge and 90- to 180-day follow-up.
Results:
We recruited 504 patients, of whom 337 (median age = 73 years, 41% female) received 643 episodes of rehabilitation in 83 different services. Initial rehabilitation was predominantly inpatient (260/337, 77%) versus community-based (77/337, 21%). Therapy time was greater within inpatient services (median = 29 hours) compared to community-based (6 hours) or transition care (16 hours). Median (Quartile 1, Quartile 3) six-month cumulative therapy time was 73 hours (40, 130) when rehabilitation commenced in stroke units and continued in inpatient rehabilitation units; 43 hours (23, 78) when commenced in inpatient rehabilitation units; and 5 hours (2, 9) with only community rehabilitation. In 317 of 504 (63%) with follow-up data, improvement in mRS was most likely with inpatient rehabilitation (OR = 3.6, 95% CI = 1.7-7.7), lower with community rehabilitation (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 0.7-3.8) compared to no rehabilitation, after adjustment for baseline factors.
Conclusion:
Amount of therapy varied widely between rehabilitation pathways. Amount of therapy and chance of improvement in function were highest with inpatient rehabilitation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches
Restorative Care

