Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Graft Viability Assessment Through Quantitative Metrics and Innovative Reservoir Systems
Published on: August 2, 2024
[Medium- and long-term outcomes of cardiac assist devices after coronary artery bypass grafting in left ventricular
1Department of Cardiovascular Sugery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.
Insights
Patients with left ventricular dysfunction undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) often require cardiac assist devices like intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Despite higher device use and mortality, optimal management leads to good medium- and long-term outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Cardiac Assist Devices
- Left Ventricular Dysfunction
Background:
- Left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF ≤40%) poses challenges during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
- Cardiac assist devices, including intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), may be necessary for these high-risk patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the medium- and long-term outcomes of cardiac assist devices in patients undergoing CABG with left ventricular dysfunction.
- To compare the use of IABP and ECMO and associated outcomes in patients with and without left ventricular dysfunction.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 127 patients with LVEF ≤40% undergoing CABG, compared to 2,454 controls with LVEF >55%.
- Data on IABP and ECMO application, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and hospital stay, and mortality were collected and analyzed.
- Follow-up assessments of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were conducted at 3, 6 months, and annually thereafter.
Main Results:
- Patients with left ventricular dysfunction showed significantly higher rates of IABP (10.2% vs 0.8%) and ECMO (6.3% vs 0.3%) usage compared to controls.
- Mortality was higher in the left ventricular dysfunction group (4.7% vs 0.7%), along with longer ICU and hospital stays.
- In the left ventricular dysfunction group, LVEF improved post-surgery, reaching (48±8)% at 3 months, (51±9)% at 6 months, and (55±9)% at 1 year, with stable maintenance thereafter.
Conclusions:
- Despite a high requirement for cardiac assist devices, patients with left ventricular dysfunction undergoing CABG can achieve favorable medium- and long-term outcomes with optimal perioperative management.
- The findings support the recommendation of cardiac assist devices in clinical practice for selected patients with left ventricular dysfunction undergoing CABG.
Abstract:
Objective: To evaluate the medium-and long-term outcomes of cardiac assist devices after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Methods: From January 2012 to May 2018, a total of 127 patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) value (≤40%) undergoing CABG in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were selected. Meanwhile, another 2 454 cases with LVEF>55% were also enrolled as controls. Clinical data of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) application were compared and analyzed. All patients were followed up at the Outpatient Clinic at different time points (3 and 6 months after surgery, then every year). Results: Compared to the control group, IABP usage (10.2% vs 0.8%), ECMO usage (6.3% vs 0.3%) and the mortality (4.7% vs 0.7%) were higher (all P<0.05) in the left ventricular dysfunction group. Additionally, Intensive Care Unit stay [(50±12) h vs (33±10) h] and the hospital stay after surgery [(15±3) d vs (11±4) d] was longer in the left ventricular dysfunction group (all P<0.05). In the left ventricular dysfunction group, LVEF at 3, 6 month and 1 year was (48±8)%, (51±9)%, and (55±9)%, respectively, and then maintained stable. Conclusions: Patients with left ventricular dysfunction who received coronary artery bypass grafting had a high rate of cardiac assist devicesuse, however, optimal perioperative management can save the lives of some patients, whose medium-and long-term outcome are good. Therefore, it is worthy of being recommended in clinical practice.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management

