Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

20.9K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
20.9K
Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

43.6K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
43.6K
Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

13.2K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
13.2K
Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

22.9K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
22.9K
Photoreceptors and Plant Responses to Light02:00

Photoreceptors and Plant Responses to Light

28.1K
Light plays a significant role in regulating the growth and development of plants. In addition to providing energy for photosynthesis, light provides other important cues to regulate a range of developmental and physiological responses in plants.
28.1K
Mate Choice01:20

Mate Choice

11.4K
Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
11.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

In situ observations reveal a link between association behaviour, camouflage and eye complexity in midwater amphipods.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Equine maxillofacial intraosseous cystic lesions: a retrospective study of 17 cases.

Frontiers in veterinary science·2025
Same author

Camouflage Using Surface Disruption: The Importance of Corners Versus Edges.

Ecology and evolution·2025
Same author

Reconstructing illusory camouflage patterns on moth wings using computer vision.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2025
Same author

A leaf-mimicking moth uses nanostructures to create 3D leaf shape appearance.

Current biology : CB·2025
Same author

Form-function relationships of the compound eyes and sensory sensilla of a tiny arboreal hemipteran herbivore: Adaptations for close encounters with leaves.

Arthropod structure & development·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Manipulation of Color Patterns in Jumping Spiders for Use in Behavioral Experiments
09:03

Manipulation of Color Patterns in Jumping Spiders for Use in Behavioral Experiments

Published on: May 21, 2019

9.9K

Countershading enhances camouflage by reducing prey contrast.

Callum G Donohue1, Jan M Hemmi1,2, Jennifer L Kelley1,2

  • 1School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia.

Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|May 13, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Countershading, a camouflage pattern, effectively hides prey by reducing luminance contrast, making them harder for predators to detect. This study reveals how this pattern enhances concealment in three-dimensional animals under overhead lighting conditions.

Keywords:
adaptive colorationcamouflagecrypsispredator–prey interactionsvisual detection

More Related Videos

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

9.5K
Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

8.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Manipulation of Color Patterns in Jumping Spiders for Use in Behavioral Experiments
09:03

Manipulation of Color Patterns in Jumping Spiders for Use in Behavioral Experiments

Published on: May 21, 2019

9.9K
Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

9.5K
Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

8.5K

Area of Science:

  • Animal behavior
  • Evolutionary biology
  • Visual ecology

Background:

  • Three-dimensional body shapes create luminance gradients under overhead lighting, posing challenges for camouflage.
  • Countershading, where animals are darker on top, is theorized to enhance concealment but its effectiveness and mechanisms are not fully understood.
  • Previous research has not investigated how countershading affects prey contrast or predator detection under controlled conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of countershading in camouflage by examining its effect on prey contrast and detectability.
  • To determine if the direction of the luminance gradient (darkest or lightest on top) impacts predator's ability to resolve prey's three-dimensional shape.
  • To compare the detectability of countershaded prey versus uniformly pigmented prey under controlled lighting.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized live western rainbowfish (Melanotaenia australis) as predators.
  • Employed computer-generated prey images with varying degrees of countershading and luminance contrast.
  • Assessed prey detectability, including probability and speed of detection, by the fish predators.

Main Results:

  • Optimally countershaded prey were significantly more difficult for predators to detect compared to uniformly pigmented prey.
  • Prey detection probability and speed were directly influenced by the luminance contrast between countershaded prey and the background.
  • Uniformly pigmented prey were consistently highly detectable, despite their average luminance matching the background.

Conclusions:

  • Countershading is an effective camouflage strategy that reduces prey conspicuousness by minimizing luminance contrast, particularly under overhead lighting.
  • Uniformly pigmented three-dimensional prey are conspicuous due to increased luminance contrast caused by lighting.
  • The study found no evidence to support the hypothesis that countershading interferes with predator perception of three-dimensional form.