Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
A Comparison of UK Preterm Anthropometric Charts and INTERGROWTH-21st: Is It Time to Change Growth Charts?
Owen Martyn Bendor-Samuel1, Sanja Zivanovic2,3, David Odd4
1Newborn Services, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK, owenmbs@gmail.com.
Insights
UK premature infant growth charts differ significantly from international INTERGROWTH-21st standards. This impacts accurate assessment of nutritional needs and requires further study for optimal infant care.
Area of Science:
- Neonatalogy
- Pediatric Growth Standards
- Anthropometry
Background:
- Current UK practice uses Neonatal and Infant Close Monitoring (NICM) charts for premature infants, which have known limitations.
- The INTERGROWTH-21st Project offers international ante- and postnatal growth standards.
- Accurate growth centile knowledge is crucial for assessing premature infant nutritional requirements.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare target centile measurements between INTERGROWTH-21st and UK NICM growth charts for premature infants.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of anthropometric measurements (weight, head circumference) from premature neonates (24-32 weeks gestation).
- Measurements plotted on both NICM and INTERGROWTH-21st charts at three time points.
- Statistical comparison using paired-sample t test, Wilcoxon rank test, and mixed-effects linear regression.
Main Results:
- INTERGROWTH-21st charts showed significantly greater centiles for weight and head circumference compared to UK NICM charts at all time points.
- Average weight centile differences ranged from 9.1 to 16.4.
- Differences were more pronounced in female infants, up to 6.9 centiles greater than males.
Conclusions:
- UK NICM reference charts demonstrate significant divergence from INTERGROWTH-21st growth standards.
- The selection of growth charts has potential implications for premature infants' long-term adult health.
- Further prospective studies with larger datasets, including length and comprehensive population data, are warranted.
Background:
Current practice in the UK is to plot premature infant anthropometric measurements on Neonatal and Infant Close Monitoring (NICM) reference charts. These charts have several known limitations. The INTERGROWTH-21st Project has recently produced international ante- and postnatal growth standards. Exact knowledge of growth centiles allows clinicians to accurately assess infant nutritional requirements.
Objective:
To compare target centile measurements between INTERGROWTH-21st and UK NICM growth charts for premature infants.
Method:
Anthropometric measurements (weight and head circumference) of a convenience sample of neonates born between 24 and 32 weeks of gestation were analysed retrospectively. Measurements were collected across three time points and plotted on both the NICM and INTERGROWTH-21st growth charts. The respective centiles were compared and analysed by paired-sample t test, Wilcoxon rank test analysis, and multilevel mixed-effect linear regression models.
Results:
Centiles for weight and head circumference measurements of 96 infants plotted on INTERGROWTH-21st charts were significantly greater than their corresponding UK charts at all three time points. For weight, the average difference between the two charts varied from 9.1 to 16.4 centiles. The difference between the two charts was greater for female than male infants by up to 6.9 centiles (95% CI 10.1-3.8).
Conclusion:
Existing UK NICM reference charts are significantly different to the growth standards of INTERGROWTH-21st. The choice of which growth chart to adopt in the UK could have important consequences on premature infants' future adult health and therefore requires further prospective observational studies with larger data sets including length measurements and more comprehensive population characteristics.
Related Concept Videos
Signs of Puberty
Variation: Normal Distribution, Range, and Standard Deviation
Nature and Nurture
Microbial Growth Measurement: Direct Methods
Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods
z Scores and Area Under the Curve

