Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila
Published on: August 22, 2013
Does Divergence in Habitat Breadth Associate with Species Differences in Decision Making in Drosophila Sechellia and
Madeline P Burns1, Frederick D Cavallaro1, Julia B Saltz1
1Department of Biosciences, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
Abstract:
Decision making is involved in many behaviors contributing to fitness, such as habitat choice, mate selection, and foraging. Because of this, high decision-making accuracy (i.e., selecting the option most beneficial for fitness) should be under strong selection. However, decision making is energetically costly, often involving substantial time and energy to survey the environment to obtain high-quality information. Thus, for high decision making accuracy to evolve, its benefits should outweigh its costs. Inconsistency in the net benefits of decision making across environments is hypothesized to be an important means for maintaining variation in this trait. However, very little is known about how environmental factors influence the evolution of decision making to produce variation among individuals, genotypes, and species. Here, we compared two recently diverged species of Drosophila differing substantially in habitat breadth and degree of environmental predictability and variability: Drosophilasechellia and Drosophilasimulans. We found that the species evolving under higher environmental unpredictability and variability showed higher decision-making accuracy, but not higher environmental sampling.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Selection
Formation of Species
Frequency-dependent Selection
The Ratio of X Chromosome to Autosomes
Normal male Drosophila has a ratio of one X chromosome to two sets of autosomes. In contrast, normal female...
Speciation Rates

