Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Assessment of Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Calcium Reserve and Intracellular Diastolic Calcium Removal in Isolated Ventricular Cardiomyocytes
Published on: September 18, 2017
Risk of Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Cardiac Sarcoidosis Independent of Left Ventricular Function
David G Rosenthal1, Richard K Cheng2, Bradley J Petek3
1Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Insights
Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) patients face high risks of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and sudden cardiac death (SCD), regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Even with normal LVEF, vigilance for arrhythmia risk is crucial in CS.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Sarcoidosis Research
Background:
- Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a complex inflammatory condition affecting the heart.
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a key indicator of cardiac function, but its prognostic value in CS requires further clarification.
- Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) are significant concerns in CS patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between baseline LVEF and the risk of VA/SCD, heart transplantation, and death in patients with CS.
- To determine if LVEF <35% is a significant predictor of adverse outcomes in CS.
- To identify optimal LVEF thresholds for risk stratification in CS.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 110 CS patients meeting 2014 Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) criteria.
- Patients were categorized by baseline LVEF: <35% (n=32) and ≥35% (n=78).
- Logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess risk factors and outcomes, including VA/SCD, heart transplantation, and death.
Main Results:
- Overall, 44.5% of CS patients experienced VA/SCD during a median follow-up of 2.6 years.
- Patients with LVEF <35% had a higher incidence of VA/SCD (59.4%) compared to those with LVEF ≥35% (38.5%).
- Adjusted analysis did not show a significant association between LVEF <35% and increased VA/SCD risk, but a trend towards higher risk of heart transplantation and death was observed in the lower LVEF group.
Conclusions:
- CS patients exhibit high rates of VA, SCD, and heart transplantation, irrespective of LVEF.
- While LVEF <35% suggests an elevated risk for VA/SCD, this association was not statistically significant after adjustment in this cohort.
- All CS patients warrant thorough arrhythmia risk assessment, even those with preserved LVEF.
Abstract:
This study investigated the association between left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and the risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VA), heart transplantation, and death in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). We identified 110 CS patients meeting 2014 Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) diagnostic criteria with baseline LVEF <35% (n = 32) or ≥35% (n = 78). The primary end point was sustained VA or sudden cardiac death (SCD), and secondary end points included risk of heart transplantation, death, or a composite. Logistic regression determined risk factors for VA/SCD, and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed for secondary end points. Receiver operating curve analysis determined the best discrimination point of LVEF for each end point; sensitivity analyses evaluated the effects of higher LVEF on each end point. Over a follow-up of 2.6 (range 1.0 to 5.8) years, 49 (44.5%) CS patients experienced VA/SCD, including 19 of 32 (59.4%) with LVEF <35%, and 30 of 78 (38.5%) with LVEF ≥35%. After adjustment, LVEF <35% was not significantly associated with an increased risk of VA/SCD compared with LVEF ≥35% (odds ratio 1.3, 95% confidence intervals 0.5 to 3.7). Although LVEF <35% was associated with an increased risk of heart transplantation and death (28.1% vs 12.8%, p = 0.05), this was not significant after adjustment (hazard ratio 1.7, 95% confidence intervals 0.5 to 9.0, p = 0.53). In conclusion, patients with CS experience high rates of VA, SCD, and heart transplantation, even when LVEF is mildly impaired or normal. Patients with LVEF <35% are at particularly elevated risk of VA/SCD. Our findings highlight the imperative to investigate arrhythmia risk in all patients with CS, even in the setting of an otherwise reassuring LVEF.
More Related Videos
08:21Biventricular Assessment of Cardiac Function and Pressure-Volume Loops by Closed-Chest Catheterization in Mice
Published on: June 15, 2020
14:35Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Rheumatic Heart Disease I: Introduction
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care