Movers and Stayers: What Birthplaces Can Teach Us About Rural Practice Choice Among Midwestern General Surgeons

This study compares practicing rural Midwestern general surgeons born in urban areas to those born in rural areas to describe the association between birthplace and current practice location.

The 2017 AMA MasterFile was used to study general surgeons in the Midwest Census Division. Surgeons were assigned to categories based on birthplace and current practice locations: urban-urban stayers, urban-rural movers, rural-rural stayers, and rural-urban movers. Urban and rural classifications corresponded to the metropolitan and nonmetropolitan definitions with Rural-Urban Continuum Codes (urban, RUCCs 1-3; rural, RUCCs 4-9). Bivariate tests and logistic regression were used to determine factors associated with rural practice choice.

There were 3,070 general surgeons in the study population: 70.6% urban-urban stayers, 13.1% urban-rural movers, 10.7% rural-urban movers, and 5.7% rural-rural stayers. Rural areas netted 74 surgeons (327 rural-urban movers versus 401 urban-rural movers). Logistic regression results found different factors predicted rural practice among urban-born versus rural-born surgeons. Older urban-born surgeons were more likely to practice rurally, as were male surgeons, DOs, and those trained in less-urban residency programs. Among rural-born surgeons, more rural birthplaces and having trained at a less-urban residency were associated with practicing rurally.

Recruiting urban-born surgeons to rural areas has proven successful in the Midwest; our findings show urban-born surgeons outnumber rural-born surgeons in rural communities. Given the ongoing need for surgeons in rural areas, urban-born surgeons should not be overlooked. Findings suggest educators and community leaders should expand less-urban training opportunities given their potential influence on all general surgeons.