Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Antimicrobial Synergy Testing by the Inkjet Printer-assisted Automated Checkerboard Array and the Manual Time-kill Method
Published on: April 18, 2019
False Laboratory Test Result Through Colistin Interference in an Intensive Care Patient: Case Report
Veli F Pehlivan1, Ataman Gönel2, Basak Pehlivan1
1Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Harran University Faculty of Medicine, Sanliurfa, Turkey.
Background:
In blood samples taken for testing purposes during drug infusion in the intensive care unit, there is a risk of interference due to drug-reactive interaction during the analysis.
Case Report:
A 19-year-old female patient had undergone surgery for intracranial astrocytoma, 12 years ago. Acinetobacter baumannii was found in the blood culture and deep tracheal aspiration fluid of the patient who had a fever (39.2 °C) with a body temperature during the follow-up. The patient was started on colistin 2 * 4.5 million IU. After the colistin infusion, biochemical tests were requested to control the patient's clinical situation. CK-MB mass and ProBNP values were measured in high concentrations. Cardiology consultation was requested to evaluate the increase in the CK-MB mass and ProBNP values. The patient's ECG and echocardiography showed no abnormality. The increase in cardiac markers was neither clinically acceptable nor insignificant. There was no hemolysis in the sample or analytical error in the device. Variability in the tests was thought to be due to the interference. As the bloodletting time was questioned, it was determined that it was taken during colistin treatment. In order to determine the effect of colistin-related interference on the other tests, the laboratory was contacted and additional tests (TSH, FT4, Anti- TPO, B-HCG, Estradiol, Prolactin, CA 125, CA 15-3, CA 19-9, Vitamin B12, C-Peptide, DDimer, PTH, 25 hydroxy vitamin D, PT, INR, APTT) were conducted. During colistin treatment, in many tests, bias was detected between -75 and + 268.80%.
Conclusion:
Clinicians should consider suspicious test results that are incompatible with the diagnosis for the possibility of erroneous measurements due to colistin interference and review the sampling processes.
More Related Videos
09:26Antibiotic Efficacy Testing in an Ex vivo Model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms in the Cystic Fibrosis Lung
Published on: January 22, 2021
11:17Multiplex Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by Isotope-dilution HPLC-MS/MS of Antibiotics in Critical Illnesses
Published on: August 30, 2018