Outcomes of Cardiac Catheterization in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation on Anticoagulation in Contemporary in Practice: An Analysis of the ORBIT II Registry
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Matthew W Sherwood1, Jonathan P Piccini2, DaJuanicia N Holmes2
1Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA (M.W.S.).
Insights
Patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac catheterization often have their oral anticoagulation (OAC) interrupted, increasing stroke risk. Bleeding avoidance strategies and bridging therapy are underused, necessitating improved management protocols for these patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Internal Medicine
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) on oral anticoagulation (OAC) undergoing cardiac catheterization face dual risks of embolic and bleeding events.
- Contemporary practice guidelines and real-world data on managing these risks are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the clinical and procedural characteristics of AF patients on OAC undergoing cardiac catheterization.
- To evaluate the use of bleeding avoidance strategies and bridging therapy.
- To compare outcomes (death, stroke, major bleeding) based on OAC type.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 741 patients from the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation II Registry (2013-2016).
- Patients were on oral anticoagulation (warfarin or direct-acting oral anticoagulants).
- Outcomes were compared between warfarin and direct-acting oral anticoagulant groups at 30 days and 1 year.
Main Results:
- Most patients (93.8%) had OAC interrupted; only 58-60.7% restarted OAC post-procedure.
- Radial artery access and bivalirudin use were infrequent (approx. 33% and 4.6%, respectively).
- Warfarin users had higher rates of major bleeding (43.3 vs. 12.9 events/100 patient-years) and stroke (4.9 vs. 1.9 events/100 patient-years) compared to direct-acting oral anticoagulant users.
Conclusions:
- Cardiac catheterization in AF patients on OAC often involves OAC interruption and infrequent use of bleeding avoidance strategies.
- A significant proportion of patients do not restart OAC, increasing stroke risk.
- Further research is needed to optimize management strategies for AF patients undergoing cardiac catheterization.
Background:
Patients with atrial fibrillation on oral anticoagulation (OAC) undergoing cardiac catheterization face risks for embolic and bleeding events, yet information on strategies to mitigate these risks in contemporary practice is lacking.
Methods:
We aimed to describe the clinical/procedural characteristics of a contemporary cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation on OAC who underwent cardiac catheterization. Use of bleeding avoidance strategies and bridging therapy were described and outcomes including death, stroke, and major bleeding at 30 days and 1 year were compared by OAC type.
Results:
Of 13 404 patients in the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation II Registry from 2013 to 2016, 741 underwent cardiac catheterization (139 with percutaneous coronary intervention) in the setting of OAC. The patients' median age was 71, 61.8% were male, white (87.2%), had hypertension (83.7%), hyperlipidemia (72.1%), diabetes mellitus (31.6%), and chronic kidney disease (28.2%); 20.2% received warfarin while 79.8% received direct acting oral anticoagulant. One third of patients underwent radial artery access, and bivalirudin was used in 4.6%. Bridging therapy was used more often in patients on warfarin versus direct acting oral anticoagulant (16.7% versus10.0%). OAC was interrupted in 93.8% of patients. Patients on warfarin versus direct acting oral anticoagulant were equally likely to restart OAC (58.0% versus 60.7%), had similar use of antiplatelet therapy (44.0% versus 41.3%) after catheterization, and had similar rates of myocardial infarction and death at 1 year, but higher rates of major bleeding (43.3 versus 12.9 events/100 patient years) and stroke (4.9 versus 1.9 events/100 patient years).
Conclusions:
In a real-world registry of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac catheterization, most cases are elective, performed by femoral access, with interruption of OAC. Bleeding avoidance strategies such as radial artery access and bivalirudin were used infrequently and use of bridging therapy was uncommon. Nearly 40% of patients did not restart OAC postprocedure, exposing patients to risk for stroke. Further research is necessary to optimize the management of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac catheterization.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care

