Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern01:29

Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern

388
Assessing the gastrointestinal (GI) system is a complex process that begins with collecting subjective data. This data, collected through patient interviews, provides crucial insights into the patient's health history, perception patterns, and lifestyle habits, all contributing significantly to GI health.
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
388
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test01:30

Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test

639
Gastrointestinal (GI) diagnostic studies are pivotal in confirming, ruling out, diagnosing, or staging various diseases, including cancers. Following diagnosis, allocating time for discussions with the patient and providing informational resources is crucial. Diagnostic assessments of the GI tract often occur in outpatient settings like endoscopy suites or GI labs. Preparation for these tests may include dietary restrictions, fasting, liquid bowel preparations, laxatives, enemas, and the...
639

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

High Prevalence of Clinical Understaging in Early Gastric Cancer: An Analysis of the NCDB.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Comparable Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Medicaid and Commercially Insured Patients at a High-Volume Institution.

HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery·2026
Same author

Individual Strategies and Institutional Solutions: Advancement of Asian Women in Academic Surgery.

The Journal of surgical research·2026
Same author

ASO Visual Abstract: High Prevalence of Clinical Understaging in Early Gastric Cancer: An Analysis of the NCDB.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Biomarker-Driven Management of Nonmetastatic GEJ Adenocarcinoma.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Accessibility of and Engagement With Videos of Colorectal Cancer Surgery Patients' Treatment Experiences: A Multi-Platform Analysis Comparing Videos Produced by Patients and Medical Institutions.

The American surgeon·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors
03:05

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors

Published on: February 16, 2024

1.4K

Utilizing Cultural and Ethnic Variables in Screening Models to Identify Individuals at High Risk for Gastric Cancer:

Haejin In1,2,3, Ian Solsky4, Philip E Castle3

  • 1Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, New York. hin@montefiore.org.

Cancer Prevention Research (Philadelphia, Pa.)
|May 16, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Identifying high-risk individuals for gastric cancer is crucial. A new model combining cultural factors with traditional risk factors significantly improves the identification of those needing gastric cancer prevention interventions.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Genetic Profiling for Fluorouracil Response in Gastric Cancer
06:21

Author Spotlight: Genetic Profiling for Fluorouracil Response in Gastric Cancer

Published on: May 10, 2024

1.1K
Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation in Gastrointestinal Cancer
07:50

Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation in Gastrointestinal Cancer

Published on: September 18, 2020

6.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors
03:05

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors

Published on: February 16, 2024

1.4K
Author Spotlight: Genetic Profiling for Fluorouracil Response in Gastric Cancer
06:21

Author Spotlight: Genetic Profiling for Fluorouracil Response in Gastric Cancer

Published on: May 10, 2024

1.1K
Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation in Gastrointestinal Cancer
07:50

Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation in Gastrointestinal Cancer

Published on: September 18, 2020

6.0K

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Gastric cancer risk stratification is essential for targeted prevention, especially in low-incidence areas.
  • Conventional risk factor models may not fully capture individual risk profiles.
  • Integrating ethnic and cultural factors could enhance risk identification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a parsimonious model for identifying high-risk individuals for gastric cancer.
  • To compare the predictive performance of a conventional model versus a parsimonious model incorporating cultural and socioeconomic factors.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from a case-control study (40 gastric cancer cases, 100 controls).
  • Developed a conventional model based on the Harvard Cancer Risk Index and a parsimonious model including demographic, cultural, and lifestyle variables.
  • Applied Bayes' Theorem to establish probability cutoffs for identifying individuals with at least 10 times the baseline gastric cancer risk.

Main Results:

  • The parsimonious model, including age, U.S. generation, race, cultural food, salt intake, education, alcohol, and family history, achieved a 10-fold enrichment of baseline risk.
  • This model demonstrated a sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 94%, identifying a subcohort with a gastric cancer prevalence of 128.5 per 100,000.
  • The conventional model achieved only a 9.8-fold enrichment with lower sensitivity (31%).

Conclusions:

  • Incorporating cultural and ethnic data into risk assessment models can significantly improve the identification of U.S. individuals at high risk for gastric cancer.
  • This enhanced risk identification facilitates targeted interventions for gastric cancer prevention and control.
  • Further validation of these findings in an external dataset is warranted.