Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A brief fall-risk screening tool to support early rehabilitation referral in hemodialysis patients: multicenter prospective cohort study.

Clinical and experimental nephrology·2026
Same author

Relationships between bilateral tapping skills and brain gray matter volumes: a voxel-based morphometry study.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same author

Ten tips on how to prevent falls in dialysis patients.

Clinical kidney journal·2026
Same author

Efficacy of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Patients on Hemodialysis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Kidney medicine·2026
Same author

No effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on response inhibition.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026
Same author

Effects of stimulation frequency and pulse width in transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on finger somatosensory function.

Scientific reports·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 21, 2025

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.1K

The Repetitive Mechanical Tactile Stimulus Intervention Effects Depend on Input Methods.

Hiraku Watanabe1,2, Sho Kojima2, Naofumi Otsuru2

  • 1Graduate School, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.

Frontiers in Neuroscience
|May 16, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Active Touch, a tactile stimulation involving voluntary movement, significantly improved two-point discrimination. Passive Touch, without voluntary movement, did not show significant improvements, suggesting method-dependent effects for tactile interventions.

Keywords:
Active TouchPassive Touchmechanical tactile stimulationspatial two-point discrimination thresholdtactile threshold

More Related Videos

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
09:38

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

Published on: January 29, 2014

11.2K
Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

5.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 21, 2025

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.1K
Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
09:38

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

Published on: January 29, 2014

11.2K
Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

5.8K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Sensory Science

Background:

  • Low spatial two-point discrimination is common in elderly and stroke patients.
  • Repetitive mechanical tactile stimulation can enhance spatial two-point discrimination.
  • Tactile input methods, Active Touch (with voluntary movement) and Passive Touch (without), engage different brain regions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effects of Active Touch versus Passive Touch mechanical tactile stimulation on two-point discrimination.
  • To investigate how voluntary movement influences the efficacy of tactile stimulation interventions.

Main Methods:

  • 15 healthy young adults (20-23 years) participated.
  • Mechanical tactile stimulation was applied to the right index finger for 10 minutes using a 24-pin piezoelectric actuator device.
  • Interventions included Active Touch (voluntary finger movement) and Passive Touch (static stimulation).
  • Two-point discrimination thresholds were measured before and after each intervention.

Main Results:

  • Active Touch intervention led to a significant reduction in two-point discrimination thresholds.
  • Passive Touch intervention did not yield significant changes in thresholds.
  • A negative correlation was found between the intervention effect and pre-intervention performance for Passive Touch.

Conclusions:

  • The effectiveness of mechanical tactile stimulation for improving two-point discrimination depends on the input method.
  • Active Touch, involving voluntary movement, is a promising intervention for enhancing tactile sensory function.