Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats
Published on: June 28, 2019
Safety of Revascularization Deferral of Left Main Stenosis Based on Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Evaluation
Takayuki Warisawa1, Christopher M Cook2, Christopher Rajkumar2
1National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine Yokohama City Seibu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Insights
Deferring left main coronary artery stenosis treatment based on the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) showed similar long-term safety and clinical outcomes compared to revascularization. This suggests iFR is a safe tool for guiding treatment decisions in these patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Outcomes Research
Background:
- The instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) is established for guiding revascularization in stable coronary artery disease.
- Safety data for deferring left main (LM) coronary artery stenosis treatment based on iFR is lacking.
- LM stenosis requires careful consideration due to its critical location and potential for severe outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with left main (LM) coronary artery stenosis.
- To assess the safety of deferring revascularization based on the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) in LM stenosis.
- To compare outcomes between deferred and revascularized LM stenosis guided by iFR.
Main Methods:
- Multicenter observational study of 314 patients with LM stenosis.
- Patients were divided into deferred (n=163) or revascularized (n=151) groups based on iFR cutoff ≤0.89.
- Primary endpoint: composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization over a median 30-month follow-up.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in the primary endpoint between deferred (9.2%) and revascularized (14.6%) groups (p=0.26).
- Similar rates for secondary endpoints including all-cause death, cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization between groups (p>0.05 for all).
- Hazard ratio for the primary endpoint was 1.45 (95% CI: 0.75 to 2.81) favoring the deferred group.
Conclusions:
- Deferral of revascularization for LM stenosis guided by iFR appears safe.
- Long-term clinical outcomes are comparable to those undergoing revascularization based on iFR values.
- iFR is a reliable physiological index for guiding management decisions in LM coronary artery stenosis.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to assess the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with left main coronary artery (LM) stenosis in whom treatment strategy was based on the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR).
Background:
The overall safety of iFR to guide revascularization decision making in patients with stable coronary artery disease has been established. However, no study has examined the safety of deferral of revascularization of LM disease on the basis of iFR.
Methods:
This multicenter observational study included 314 patients in whom LM stenosis was deferred (n = 163 [51.9%]) or revascularized (n = 151 [48.1%]) according to the iFR cutoff ≤0.89. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. The secondary endpoints were each individual component of the primary endpoint and also cardiac death.
Results:
At a median follow-up period of 30 months, the primary endpoint occurred in 15 patients (9.2%) in the deferred group and 22 patients (14.6%) in the revascularized group (hazard ratio: 1.45; 95% confidence interval: 0.75 to 2.81; p = 0.26), indicating no evidence of a significant difference between the 2 groups. For the secondary endpoints, findings in the iFR-based deferral and revascularization groups were as follows: all-cause death, 3.7% versus 4.6%; cardiac death, 1.2% versus 2.0%; nonfatal myocardial infarction, 2.5% versus 5.3%; and target lesion revascularization, 4.3% versus 5.3% (p > 0.05 for all).
Conclusions:
Deferral of revascularization of LM stenosis on the basis of iFR appears to be safe, with similar long-term outcomes to those in patients in whom LM revascularization was performed according to iFR values.
More Related Videos
05:07Author Spotlight: Improved Localization and Monitoring of Coronary Flow Reserve Using Modified PLAX View in Mice
Published on: August 25, 2023
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023