Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 21, 2025

A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis
Published on: June 2, 2015
Spanish multicenter real - life registry of retrievable vena cava filters (REFiVeC)
Miguel A De Gregorio1, Jose A Guirola2, Jose Urbano3
1Hospital Universitario Lozano Blesa, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain. mgregori@unizar.es.
Insights
This study found that 76.9% of inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) were successfully retrieved, with an adjusted rate of 94.15%. Filter tilting was a rare cause of retrieval failure, highlighting clinician control over the IVCF removal process.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Radiology
- Cardiology
Background:
- Systemic anticoagulation is standard for venous thromboembolic disease.
- Inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) are used when anticoagulation is contraindicated or fails.
- Rising IVCF complications necessitate timely retrieval when no longer indicated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the IVCF retrieval rate in a Spanish registry.
- To analyze causes of failed retrieval and associated complications.
- To assess 12-month outcomes following IVCF implantation and retrieval.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 356 IVCF implantations in 355 patients.
- Data collection on filter types, retrieval success, and reasons for non-retrieval.
- Assessment of procedure-related complications and 12-month patient outcomes.
Main Results:
- A global IVCF retrieval rate of 76.9% (274/356) was achieved.
- Reasons for non-retrieval included ongoing need for filtration (11.5%), patient death (6.7%), and filter embedding/tilting (4.7%).
- No major complications were reported during retrieval procedures.
Conclusions:
- The adjusted IVCF retrieval rate was high at 94.15% with no major complications.
- Filter tilting was associated with <5% of retrieval failures.
- The study suggests clinician control over IVCF retrieval procedures.
Background:
The treatment of venous thromboembolic disease the treatment of choice is systemic anticoagulation. However, the interruption of the inferior vena cava with filters has been recommended when anticoagulation fails or there is a contraindication. Due to the rising inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) complications, physicians are encouraged to retrieve them when there is no longer recommended. In daily practice, it may be a difficult close follow-up of these patients. In this study, the primary objective was to evaluate the IVCF retrieval rate of all implanted filters in a Spanish registry. Secondary objectives were to analyze the causes of failed retrieval, procedure-related complications, and outcomes at a 12-month follow-up.
Results:
Three hundred fifty-six vena cava filters were implanted in 355 patients. The types of filter were: Gunther Tulip (Cook Medical) 160 (44.9%), Optease (Cordis) 77 (21.6%), Celect (Cook Medical) 49 (13, 7%), Aegisy (Lifetech Scientific) 33 (9.2%), Option ELITE (Argon Medical devices) 16 (4.4%), Denali filter (BD Bard) 11 (3.08%), ALN filter (ALN) 10 (2.8%). Removal was achieved in 274/356 (76,9%). eighty-two (23,1%) IVCF were not retrieved due to the following: 41 (11,5%) patients required ongoing filtration, 24 IVCF (6,7%) patients died before retrieval, and 17 (4,7%) impossibility of retrieval because of a tilted and embedded filter apex. There were no major complications observed.
Conclusions:
The global retrieval rate of IVCF was achieved in 76.9%, and the adjusted retrieval rate was of 94.15% with no major complications. IVCF tilting was associated with failure of filter removal in less than 5% of cases. This study demonstrates that the retrieval procedure of IVCF is controlled by the clinician and not by the interventional radiologist.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Hemoperfusion and Hemofiltration
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

