Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Improved Home Blood Pressure Control by CT-guided Ozone-mediated Renal Denervation for Patients with Resistant Hypertension
Published on: June 6, 2025
Prognostic Value of Masked Uncontrolled Hypertension Defined by Different Ambulatory Blood Pressure Criteria
Francesca Coccina1, Anna M Pierdomenico2, Chiara Cuccurullo2
1Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University "Gabriele d'Annunzio", Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Insights
Masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) increases cardiovascular risk. Different ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring definitions of MUCH show varying prognostic values in treated hypertensive patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hypertension Research
- Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
Background:
- Masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH), characterized by normal clinic blood pressure (BP) but elevated out-of-office BP, poses a higher cardiovascular risk than controlled hypertension (CH).
- Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) is crucial for diagnosing MUCH, with definitions varying based on daytime, nighttime, or 24-hour BP thresholds.
- The prognostic implications of these diverse ABPM-based MUCH definitions remain unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the prognostic value of different ambulatory BP criteria for defining masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH).
- To compare the cardiovascular event risk associated with various definitions of MUCH in treated hypertensive patients.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 738 treated hypertensive patients with nonhypertensive clinic BP was analyzed.
- Patients were categorized into controlled hypertension (CH) or various MUCH groups based on daytime, nighttime, or 24-hour ambulatory BP thresholds.
- Cardiovascular events were tracked over a mean follow-up of 10 years, with adjusted hazard ratios calculated.
Main Results:
- Significant proportions of patients met criteria for MUCH across different definitions (ranging from 5.5% to 48.5%).
- Compared to CH, adjusted hazard ratios for cardiovascular events in MUCH groups ranged from 1.15 to 2.29.
- Specific definitions, such as daytime + nighttime MUCH (Group 6), showed a significantly elevated risk (HR 2.29).
Conclusions:
- The definition of masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) based on ambulatory BP criteria significantly influences its prognostic impact.
- Different ABPM criteria for MUCH may carry distinct cardiovascular risks in treated hypertensive individuals.
- Further research is needed to standardize MUCH definitions for accurate risk stratification.
Background:
Masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH), that is, nonhypertensive clinic but high out-of-office blood pressure (BP) in treated patients is at increased cardiovascular risk than controlled hypertension (CH), that is, nonhypertensive clinic and out-of-office BP. Using ambulatory BP, MUCH can be defined as daytime and/or nighttime and/or 24-hour BP above thresholds. It is unclear whether different definitions of MUCH have similar prognostic information. This study assessed the prognostic value of MUCH defined by different ambulatory BP criteria.
Methods:
Cardiovascular events were evaluated in 738 treated hypertensive patients with nonhypertensive clinic BP. Among them, participants were classified as having CH or daytime MUCH (BP ≥135/85 mm Hg) regardless of nighttime BP (group 1), nighttime MUCH (BP ≥120/70 mm Hg) regardless of daytime BP (group 2), 24-hour MUCH (BP ≥130/80 mm Hg) regardless of daytime or nighttime BP (group 3), daytime MUCH only (group 4), nighttime MUCH only (group 5), and daytime + nighttime MUCH (group 6).
Results:
We detected 215 (29%), 357 (48.5%), 275 (37%), 42 (5.5%),184 (25%) and 173 (23.5%) patients with MUCH from group 1 to 6, respectively. During the follow-up (10 ± 5 years), 148 events occurred in patients with CH and MUCH. After adjustment for covariates, compared with patients with CH, the adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for cardiovascular events was 2.01 (1.45-2.79), 1.53 (1.09-2.15), 1.69 (1.22-2.34), 1.52 (0.80-2.91), 1.15 (0.74-1.80), and 2.29 (1.53-3.42) from group 1 to 6, respectively.
Conclusions:
The prognostic impact of MUCH defined according to various ambulatory BP definitions may be different.
More Related Videos
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
07:51Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension I: Introduction
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure