Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Acute Pancreatitis II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Retroperitoneal Approach for Necrotizing Pancreatitis
Published on: March 15, 2024
Mark D Sugi1, Derek C Sun1, Christine O Menias2
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Acute diverticulitis is a common gastrointestinal condition that can lead to emergency care and surgery. This review explores the key imaging features that help doctors diagnose and manage the condition. CT is the most reliable imaging tool, but other methods like MRI and ultrasound are also useful in specific cases. The condition can range from mild inflammation to severe complications like abscesses and perforation. Distinguishing diverticulitis from cancer can be challenging, and colonoscopy is often needed for confirmation. The study highlights the importance of recognizing imaging patterns and using a combination of tools to guide treatment decisions.
04:01Indocyanine Green-Guided Intraoperative Imaging to Facilitate Video-Assisted Retroperitoneal Debridement for Treating Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis
Published on: September 8, 2022
08:20Murine Distal Colostomy, A Novel Model of Diversion Colitis in C57BL/6 Mice
Published on: July 12, 2018
Area of Science:
Background:
Acute diverticulitis is a common gastrointestinal condition that often leads to emergency care and surgery. Prior research has shown that CT is widely used for diagnosing this condition and its complications. However, diagnostic uncertainty remains when distinguishing diverticulitis from other pathologies, such as malignancy. No prior work had resolved how to consistently differentiate benign from malignant findings using imaging alone. This gap motivated the need to synthesize current evidence on imaging features and diagnostic challenges. Understanding the clinical and radiological manifestations is essential for accurate diagnosis. The condition affects multiple segments of the gastrointestinal tract, not just the sigmoid colon. Variability in disease presentation complicates diagnostic accuracy. Recognizing imaging pitfalls is crucial for avoiding misdiagnosis. This paper addresses the need for a comprehensive review of key imaging features.
Purpose Of The Study:
This review aims to clarify the key imaging features of acute diverticulitis and its complications. The specific problem is the diagnostic challenge in differentiating diverticulitis from colonic malignancy using imaging alone. The motivation is to guide clinical management by identifying reliable imaging markers. The study explores both common and uncommon disease presentations. It also addresses the limitations of imaging in certain clinical scenarios. The goal is to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce unnecessary interventions. The review focuses on both acute and chronic disease manifestations. It highlights the importance of multimodal imaging approaches in specific patient populations.
Main Methods:
The authors conducted a literature review of acute diverticulitis imaging features. They synthesized evidence from diagnostic imaging studies and clinical guidelines. The approach included analyzing CT, MRI, and ultrasound findings. The study categorized diverticulitis into uncomplicated and complicated types. It examined the role of virtual CT colonoscopy in screening and follow-up. The authors also discussed pitfalls in imaging interpretation. The review included both common and uncommon disease presentations. The synthesis focused on distinguishing benign from malignant findings.
Main Results:
CT is the most sensitive and specific imaging modality for diagnosing acute diverticulitis. Uncomplicated disease is marked by wall thickening and phlegmonous changes. Complicated cases involve larger abscesses, fistulas, and perforation. Recurrent episodes may lead to bowel wall hypertrophy and obstruction. Imaging features like pericolic fat stranding help identify inflammation. Differentiating from malignancy remains a diagnostic challenge. Colonoscopy is often needed for definitive diagnosis. The review highlights the importance of recognizing imaging pitfalls.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that CT remains the gold standard for diagnosing acute diverticulitis. They emphasize the diagnostic value of identifying wall thickening and pericolic fat stranding. The review suggests that complications such as abscesses and fistulas are reliably detected with imaging. The authors note that imaging alone may not always distinguish benign from malignant findings. They recommend colonoscopy for cases with diagnostic uncertainty. The study highlights the importance of multimodal imaging in specific patient populations. The authors propose that imaging features should guide clinical decisions. They conclude that a synthesis of imaging findings improves diagnostic accuracy.
Uncomplicated diverticulitis shows wall thickening and pericolic fat stranding, while complicated cases involve larger abscesses, fistulas, and perforation.
CT is highly sensitive and specific for detecting diverticulitis and its complications, including abscesses and perforation.
Imaging features may overlap with malignancy, requiring colonoscopy for definitive diagnosis.
Virtual CT colonoscopy serves as an adjunct in screening and evaluating complications in specific patient populations.
Recurrent episodes may cause bowel wall hypertrophy and luminal narrowing, potentially leading to obstruction.
The authors suggest that colonoscopy is often necessary to differentiate benign from malignant findings when imaging is inconclusive.