Multicenter, Observational Cohort Study Evaluating Third-Generation Cephalosporin Therapy for Bloodstream Infections Secondary to Enterobacter, Serratia, and Citrobacter Species
Caroline Derrick1, P Brandon Bookstaver2,3, Zhiqiang K Lu2
1Department of Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine Columbia, SC 29203, USA.
Objectives:
There is debate on whether the use of third-generation cephalosporins (3GC) increases the risk of clinical failure in bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by chromosomally-mediated AmpC-producing Enterobacterales (CAE). This study evaluates the impact of definitive 3GC therapy versus other antibiotics on clinical outcomes in BSIs due to Enterobacter, Serratia, or Citrobacter species.
Methods:
This multicenter, retrospective cohort study evaluated adult hospitalized patients with BSIs secondary to Enterobacter, Serratia, or Citrobacter species from 1 January 2006 to 1 September 2014. Definitive 3GC therapy was compared to definitive therapy with other non-3GC antibiotics. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression evaluated the impact of definitive 3GC on overall treatment failure (OTF) as a composite of in-hospital mortality, 30-day hospital readmission, or 90-day reinfection.
Results:
A total of 381 patients from 18 institutions in the southeastern United States were enrolled. Common sources of BSIs were the urinary tract and central venous catheters (78 (20.5%) patients each). Definitive 3GC therapy was utilized in 65 (17.1%) patients. OTF occurred in 22/65 patients (33.9%) in the definitive 3GC group vs. 94/316 (29.8%) in the non-3GC group (p = 0.51). Individual components of OTF were comparable between groups. Risk of OTF was comparable with definitive 3GC therapy vs. definitive non-3GC therapy (aHR 0.93, 95% CI 0.51-1.72) in multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.
Conclusions:
These outcomes suggest definitive 3GC therapy does not significantly alter the risk of poor clinical outcomes in the treatment of BSIs secondary to Enterobacter, Serratia, or Citrobacter species compared to other antimicrobial agents.
Insights
Third-generation cephalosporins (3GC) did not increase clinical failure risk for bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by specific Enterobacterales. This study found 3GC therapy comparable to other antibiotics for treating these BSIs.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Microbiology
- Antimicrobial Stewardship
Background:
- Debate exists regarding third-generation cephalosporin (3GC) use and clinical failure in bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by AmpC-producing Enterobacterales (CAE).
- Accurate risk assessment is crucial for optimizing antibiotic selection in BSIs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of definitive 3GC therapy versus other antibiotics on clinical outcomes in BSIs.
- To compare clinical failure rates in patients with BSIs caused by Enterobacter, Serratia, or Citrobacter species treated with 3GC versus non-3GC agents.
Main Methods:
- Multicenter, retrospective cohort study of adult hospitalized patients with BSIs.
- Comparison of definitive 3GC therapy versus other non-3GC antibiotics.
- Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to assess overall treatment failure (OTF).
Main Results:
- 381 patients with BSIs from Enterobacter, Serratia, or Citrobacter species were analyzed.
- Overall treatment failure (OTF) rates were similar: 33.9% for 3GC vs. 29.8% for non-3GC (p=0.51).
- Adjusted hazard ratio for OTF was 0.93 (95% CI 0.51-1.72) for 3GC therapy.
Conclusions:
- Definitive 3GC therapy does not significantly increase the risk of poor clinical outcomes in BSIs caused by Enterobacter, Serratia, or Citrobacter species.
- 3GC therapy is a viable option comparable to other antimicrobial agents for these specific BSIs.
More Related Videos
10:00Targeting Biofilm Associated Staphylococcus aureus Using Resazurin Based Drug-susceptibility Assay
Published on: May 5, 2016
10:38Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
