Multicenter, Observational Cohort Study Evaluating Third-Generation Cephalosporin Therapy for Bloodstream Infections

Caroline Derrick1, P Brandon Bookstaver2,3, Zhiqiang K Lu2

  • 1Department of Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine Columbia, SC 29203, USA.

Abstract

Insights

Third-generation cephalosporins (3GC) did not increase clinical failure risk for bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by specific Enterobacterales. This study found 3GC therapy comparable to other antibiotics for treating these BSIs.

Area of Science:

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Clinical Microbiology
  • Antimicrobial Stewardship

Background:

  • Debate exists regarding third-generation cephalosporin (3GC) use and clinical failure in bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by AmpC-producing Enterobacterales (CAE).
  • Accurate risk assessment is crucial for optimizing antibiotic selection in BSIs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of definitive 3GC therapy versus other antibiotics on clinical outcomes in BSIs.
  • To compare clinical failure rates in patients with BSIs caused by Enterobacter, Serratia, or Citrobacter species treated with 3GC versus non-3GC agents.

Main Methods:

  • Multicenter, retrospective cohort study of adult hospitalized patients with BSIs.
  • Comparison of definitive 3GC therapy versus other non-3GC antibiotics.
  • Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to assess overall treatment failure (OTF).

Main Results:

  • 381 patients with BSIs from Enterobacter, Serratia, or Citrobacter species were analyzed.
  • Overall treatment failure (OTF) rates were similar: 33.9% for 3GC vs. 29.8% for non-3GC (p=0.51).
  • Adjusted hazard ratio for OTF was 0.93 (95% CI 0.51-1.72) for 3GC therapy.

Conclusions:

  • Definitive 3GC therapy does not significantly increase the risk of poor clinical outcomes in BSIs caused by Enterobacter, Serratia, or Citrobacter species.
  • 3GC therapy is a viable option comparable to other antimicrobial agents for these specific BSIs.

Related Concept Videos

Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test01:26

Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test

A urine culture and sensitivity test is a diagnostic procedure used to identify urinary tract bacterial infections and determine the most effective antibiotics for treatment. This test is generally preferred when a patient shows manifestations of a urinary tract infection, such as frequent or painful urination, cloudy or foul-smelling urine, or lower abdominal pain.Purpose of the TestThe primary goals of a urine culture and sensitivity test are to:Determine the specific bacteria causing the...
548
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care01:30

Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

A healthcare provider can diagnose a urinary tract infection (UTI) through several methods:Medical History and Symptoms: The provider will take a detailed medical history and ask about symptoms such as frequent urination, burning sensation during urination, and lower abdominal pain.Urinalysis: A clean-catch urine sample is collected in a sterile container and tested for the presence of bacteria, white blood cells (leukocytes), nitrites, blood, and protein. The presence of leukocytes and...
184
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management01:28

Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management

Introduction:For diagnosing acute pyelonephritis, a comprehensive patient history is collected to identify symptoms such as dysuria, frequent or urgent urination, flank pain, or costovertebral angle (CVA) tenderness that may suggest a kidney infection.Physical ExaminationDuring the physical examination, CVA tenderness is assessed. This involves gentle percussion over the costovertebral angle, where tenderness often indicates a kidney infection.Diagnostic TestsUrinalysis: Used to identify white...
207