Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...

Standard Error of the Mean

Standard Error of the Mean

The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n) to the number of categories (k).

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Development and temporal evaluation of sex-specific models to predict 4-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk based on age and neighbourhood characteristics in South Limburg, the Netherlands.

Diagnostic and prognostic research·2025

Same author

Combining Item Purification and Multiple Comparison Adjustment Methods in Detection of Differential Item Functioning.

Multivariate behavioral research·2023

Same author

Digital Health Solutions to Reduce the Burden of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Proposed by the CARRIER Consortium.

JMIR cardio·2022

Same author

On the Developmental Trajectories of Relational Concepts Among Children and Adolescents With Intellectual Disability of Undifferentiated Etiology.

American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities·2020

Same author

Does the Development of Syntax Comprehension Show a Premature Asymptote Among Persons With Down Syndrome? A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities·2019

Same author

Estimating Multilevel Models on Data Streams.

Psychometrika·2019

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

Efficient Standard Errors in Item Response Theory Models for Short Tests.

Lianne Ippel¹, David Magis²

¹Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Educational and Psychological Measurement

|May 20, 2020

Summary

Exact standard errors outperform asymptotic standard errors for ability estimation in item response theory (IRT), especially for short tests. New asymptotic formulas also show improved accuracy over classical ones.

Keywords:

ability estimation asymptotic standard error exact standard error item response theory

More Related Videos

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing

Published on: February 7, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing

Published on: February 7, 2025

Area of Science:

Psychometrics
Educational Measurement
Statistics

Background:

Item Response Theory (IRT) relies on standard errors to assess ability estimator precision.
Classical asymptotic standard error (ASE) formulas are widely used but their accuracy is debated.
Newer ASE formulas and exact standard errors have been proposed for improved precision.

Purpose of the Study:

To conduct a comprehensive comparison of exact standard errors against classical and new ASE formulas.
To evaluate these standard errors across various IRT ability estimators, models, and test lengths, particularly short tests.

Main Methods:

Global comparison of exact standard errors versus classical and new asymptotic standard error formulations.
Evaluation focused on common IRT ability estimators and models, with an emphasis on short test scenarios.

Main Results:

Exact standard errors demonstrated superior performance, exhibiting reduced bias and root mean square error compared to ASE versions.
Newer ASE formulas consistently showed lower bias than their classical counterparts.
The asymptotic framework's limitations were highlighted, especially for short tests.

Conclusions:

Exact standard errors are recommended for a more accurate assessment of ability estimator precision in IRT.
Newer ASE formulations offer a more accurate alternative to classical ASE when the asymptotic assumption is necessary.
Further research into the practical computation and utility of exact standard errors is warranted.