Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

14.7K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
14.7K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

8.5K
8.5K
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

5.4K
Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence...
5.4K
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

3.9K
3.9K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

5.0K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
5.0K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

14.7K
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
14.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Repurposing Hetrombopag for Multiple Myeloma by Targeting PNPO: A Celastrol-Inspired Approach.

Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology·2026
Same author

Health risk assessment of cadmium exposure via multiple pathways in preschool children from the inland region of Northwest China.

Environmental monitoring and assessment·2026
Same author

Prevalence and production of superantigen exotoxins by cystic fibrosis Staphylococcus aureus isolates.

Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society·2025
Same author

Prevalence, Production and the Role of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Superantigens in Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Reverse biogradient biomimetic periosteum with osteogenic and angiogenic characteristics for bone regeneration.

Materials today. Bio·2025
Same author

Association of urinary cadmium with renal injury biomarkers and optimal cut-off value of urinary cadmium in preschool children from a mining area of northwestern China.

Journal of trace elements in medicine and biology : organ of the Society for Minerals and Trace Elements (GMS)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
10:29

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Published on: May 9, 2025

2.0K

RNAPosers: Machine Learning Classifiers for Ribonucleic Acid-Ligand Poses.

Sahil Chhabra1, Jingru Xie2, Aaron T Frank3

  • 1Chemistry Department, University of Michigan, 930 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B
|May 20, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning classifiers improve the prediction of three-dimensional structures for ribonucleic acid (RNA)-small molecule complexes. RNAPosers enhance RNA-ligand pose prediction accuracy over traditional docking scores.

More Related Videos

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

801
Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

3.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
10:29

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Published on: May 9, 2025

2.0K
Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

801
Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

3.5K

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Structural biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Determining three-dimensional (3D) structures of ribonucleic acid (RNA)-small molecule ligand complexes is crucial for understanding molecular recognition.
  • Traditional computer docking methods often misclassify poses due to limitations in scoring functions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate machine learning-based pose classifiers for improved RNA-ligand 3D structure prediction.
  • To introduce RNAPosers, a novel tool for enhancing RNA-ligand pose prediction accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized machine learning to train pose classifiers using a composite pose fingerprint (FP) encoding local RNA environments.
  • Employed a leave-one-out cross-validation approach for training and testing.
  • Evaluated performance on two independent validation sets.

Main Results:

  • Machine learning classifiers significantly outperformed traditional docking scores in recovering native-like RNA-ligand poses.
  • One classifier achieved approximately 80% accuracy in recovering poses within 2.5 Å of native structures in 80 cases.
  • Validation sets showed approximately 60% accuracy in recovering near-native poses.

Conclusions:

  • RNAPosers provide a more accurate method for predicting RNA-ligand complex structures compared to existing docking scoring functions.
  • The developed classifiers offer a valuable tool for researchers in RNA structural biology and drug discovery.
  • RNAPosers are made publicly available to the academic community.